An unfortunate reality of ideologies going mainstream is they will be adopted by low iq people who, if we’re not careful, will dumb down the discourse to the point of parody.
No, Juan; the Poles, who have one of the few still functioning Western countries left; the Irish, who are the lightest-skinned people on earth (and my people); and the Greeks, who LITERALLY built the very foundation of modern Western civilization, are not brown.
The re-normalization of race realism shouldn’t also lead to the return of retarded ethno “realism” based on nothing but centuries old civilizational conflicts. All ethnic Europeans are white, even the retarded ones (Russians).
Every single aspect of American society is built around subsidizing blacks.
we fund blacks’ food so they can get obese.
we fund blacks’ healthcare when they get sick from being obese.
we fund blacks’ housing so they can breed more blacks.
we fund blacks’ education so they can get into college despite being retarded.
We build entire cities around blacks and then burn them down when they chimp out.
We send White men to die in wars so blacks can have more welfare.
We import more third worlders to subsidize even more blacks.
Literally everything is a wealth transfer from productive Whites to worthless blacks.
I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.
I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.
The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.
Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.
This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.
Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.
These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.
This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.
These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.
And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.
It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.
These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.
Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.
Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.
Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.
Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.
NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.
And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.
Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.
As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.
Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.
@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.
The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.
In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.
Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.
Having attended our inquiry hearings, spoken with so many survivors, read our report?
I have never been more convinced that the very worst rape gang offenders should not be deported.
A Restore British Government, with the British people’s approval, will put them to death.
The victim testimony of Chloe from the rape gang inquiry is horrific
- Abducted by a Muslim abuser
- Raped her at 12 years old in a graveyard
- Raped her with a whiskey bottle which broke off in her vagina
- NHS removed the pieces but asked NO questions
- Plied with drugs and drink
- Told police she was having sex with adults but was dismissed as a child prostitute
- Passed between men daily for years
- Police found her with abusers but released men after no investigation
- Chlamydia in throat/vagina, gonorrhea, warts, PID at age 13, clinic said NOTHING
- A social worker suggested she audition for a TV role as a grooming victim instead of helping.
As she got older:
- Gang invaded her home, orally raped her on her sofa in front of others.
- Raped with objects (cans, keys, baseball bat)
- Forced to house and witness abuse of other children.
- Spiked with heroin, leading to addiction and anorexia (weighed 5 stone/~70 lbs at 18).
- Coerced into Islamic conversion and "marriage" to an illegal migrant abuser who beat her daily
- gave birth to a child with health issues from her damaged body.
This all happened in Britain
In our country
To our girls
Gay men who adopt babies usually get away with raping and torturing them because they will call any inquiry or suspicion homophobia and stop it in its tracks.
Not sure how exactly we got to a point where gay men steal our infants and rape them to death with government approval, but I do know any system where that is the norm is so far gone it can only be fully overthrown.
If you say Jews are tribal and vengeful online they dox you and ruin your career.
If you say blacks are impulsive and violent in person they stomp on your head.
The lesson here is be antisemitic in person (jews are very frail), and racist online (blacks can’t figure out computers).
going through them in order:
- killed by boyfriend
- may not even exist
- killed in a road rage incident
- killed by boyfriend
- killed by another trans person
- killed by friend/acquaintance
- killed in a robbery
- exact motive unknown but he was a drug dealer killed in an area known for drugs so best guess gets a cookie
- killed by a schizophrenic black incel who appears to have mistaken him for a real woman
- killed by boyfriend
- wasn’t even murdered
- killed by a black homeless guy
It’s hard for Blacks to believe this because of their steady diet of Jew propaganda movies and media every couple of months, but…
They live in giant daycares where we protect them from one another, pay all of their bills, pay for their housing, pay for their food, give them spending money, rebuild most of the shit they break, give them infinity free healthcare, and never ever demand anything in recompense.
Nowhere else on Earth does this exist. Blacks cannot exist in the Firstworld without enormous White transfer payments every year.
🇧🇪 Belgium just convicted Dries Van Langenhove for “hate speech” because he linked mass migration to crime and social decline during a university lecture using statistics and scientific sources.
The judge openly admitted the facts themselves were not false.
That’s the terrifying part.
The ruling basically says you can still be punished even when what you say is true, if the government decides your framing is politically unacceptable.
He’s already spent over €420,000 fighting these cases and says more prosecutions are coming.
Welcome to Europe
Source: @DVanLangenhove
"White males are disproportionately committing rape."
❌ Not true
✅ Legal statement in Belgium
"Non-European migrants are disproportionately committing rape."
✅ True
❌ Illegal statement punished by prison
This is because our Anti-Racism Law criminalizes any statement that could increase "disapproval of a protected group", such as asylum seekers or migrants. White males are, of course, the only non-protected group.
These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.
"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣
"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣
This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣).
The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.
The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.
I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.