Ξ Hirschi

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

Why no new project ever gives allocation of their supply to all victims of hacks? For instance give some @base or @Optimism or @infinex_app or @TLX_FI to xtoken victims? ironbank victims? There are enought ppl which suffered out there. See @zachxbt

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@gSan71C @PolkadotDevs @Polkadot wow, less validators is the new idea. just wow

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@ready_co @Manojfern @Starknet you scam people who are not looking into twitter or your discord. for more then one time now.

[Wu Blockchain @WuBlockchain]

Ethereum Validator Exit Queue Falls From Over 2.6M ETH in September 2025 to Zero, While 2.48M ETH Waits to Enter Staking

According to Arkham, citing beaconcha in data, Ethereum’s validator exit queue has fallen to zero, meaning unstaking no longer requires a wait. Meanwhile, around 2.48 million ETH is queued to enter staking, with an estimated wait of 43 days. The exit queue previously exceeded 2.6 million ETH in September 2025. About 40.9 million ETH is currently staked, representing 33.55% of total supply, across roughly 885,000 active validators, with an average APR of 2.64%.

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@synthetix lol

[Wu Blockchain @WuBlockchain]

Bitmine Adds 126,971 ETH, Holdings Reach 5.54 Million ETH

Bitmine disclosed that it acquired 126,971 ETH over the past week, bringing its total holdings to 5.54 million ETH, equivalent to 4.59% of Ethereum’s circulating supply. The company reported total crypto and cash holdings of $9.6 billion, including 4.72 million staked ETH and $247 million in cash.

https://t.co/t20u9plbnF

[Tree News @TreeNewsFeed]

STRATEGY BOUGHT 1,550 BTC ($101.3M) AT AN AVERAGE PRICE OF $65,332 [287]

https://t.co/75Lb9AV377

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@DeanEigenmann what a fkn idiot that guy

[Stani @StaniKulechov]

The next step in the rsETH technical recovery plan has been completed with the restoration of WETH LTVs to their pre-incident levels across all affected networks. Users can now once again borrow against WETH on Aave, including through collateral and debt swaps.

[Katie Miller @KatieMiller]

A decade ago, Hollywood decided it would no longer honor films based purely on merit but also on the diversity of the cast and production team. In 2020, they formally tied Best Picture to diversity.

The Academy expanded its membership by roughly 40% in a decade through an explicit push to diversify its ranks.

The Oscars will proudly tell you that last year’s invitees were:
>41% women
>45% people of color
>55% from overseas

For 88 years, the Academy selected members and honored achievement based on merit. For the last 10 years, invitees went from 112 per year to over 900 to meet diversity targets.

This devalues and dishonors great American films and creates perverse incentives that lead studios to inflate diversity numbers in hopes of recognition by their woke peers.

Meritocracy must be restored to film.

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@THORChain you are the biggest arrogant pack in this space, hope ur users are well and you start the bleed out of money soln

[ZachXBT @zachxbt]

@circle @HyperliquidX Here before Circle & Jeremy say how much they care about the HL community and later a 8-9 fig exploit happens on HL core or EVM and they do nothing to freeze the USDC.

[Ethereum @ethereum]

Welcome home.

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

🔥 HUGE: $4.8 Trillion JP Morgan is launching a money market fund on Ethereum.

Maybe ETH will finally break $2400.

[Bull Theory @BullTheoryio]

🚨 TOMORROW IS THE MOST IMPORTANT DAY FOR CRYPTO IN U.S.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee votes on the CLARITY Act tomorrow, May 14, the first comprehensive crypto regulation bill in U.S. history.

It defines which crypto assets are regulated by the SEC and which by the CFTC.

Over 100 amendments have been filed and the banking lobby is still actively trying to kill it.

One uncommitted Republican senator could block the entire thing.

[Watcher.Guru @WatcherGuru]

JUST IN: JPMorgan to launch tokenized money-market fund on Ethereum.

[Crypto Tice @CryptoTice_]

BREAKING:

Europe is considering Ethereum as the settlement layer for a Euro stablecoin.

Not a pilot. Not a sandbox test.
Real financial infrastructure.

For sovereign money.

The ECB's Christine Lagarde said Bitcoin would never enter European reserves.

Now Europe is evaluating Ethereum to settle the Euro itself.

Public blockchains are moving from crypto markets.
To institutions.
To governments.
To sovereign settlement layers.

This is not about hype anymore.
This is about who controls the financial rails of the future.

And Ethereum just entered that conversation.

[Wismerhill @0xWismerhill]

Gnosis GIP-150 failed 28/72. Strip out Gnosis Ltd leadership's votes and it flips to 78% in favour. Non-team holders want a fair exit and an answer on the NAV discount. Leadership's response: maybe more spending, no exit.

Longer version:
GIP-150 did not pass. The final vote was 28% in favour, 72% against. Excluding Gnosis Ltd leadership’s tokens shifts the result to 78% in favour. Their personally held tokens are legitimate, circulating, and rightly count. It is only the Ltd-held GNO that we categorically reject as circulating until it is deployed on endeavours generating greater than 1x ROI.

This breakdown matters because it makes a structural problem unavoidable. The same three individuals are Gnosis Ltd cofounders, Ltd executives, and as co-founders of Gnosis, the largest individual GNO holders. They are funded by the DAO, operate the entities receiving DAO funding, and hold the voting power that decides whether that funding continues. Their personal token votes are not cast as independent tokenholders weighing a proposal on the merits; they are cast in alignment with their roles as cofounders and directors of the entity the proposal affects. When the votes attributable to that concentration are removed, the remaining holders speak clearly: 78% in favour of a fair exit and an honest answer to the discount to NAV. What is currently being represented as “the DAO’s view” is in substance the founders’ view, voted through by founders, on a proposal that constrained the founders’ own operational latitude. That is not a decentralized DAO.

The substance of the result is unambiguous regardless of how one feels about the specific mechanism. There is clear and undeniable support among GNO holders outside of Gnosis Ltd leadership for meaningful change, along with a mandate to prioritise trading above true NAV at the bare minimum and providing a fair exit mechanism for those unwilling to remain through another pivot. A protective mechanism for those willing to give the new vision a chance, without necessarily signing the entire treasury away to spending, should also exist. Both should co-exist, and become part of Gnosis DAO.

The response from leadership in the days following the beginning of the vote has been the opposite of what a 78% non-team result calls for. Leadership has verbally floated a meaningfully higher operational spending envelope for the next funding cycle, as well as a hostility towards exploring a solution, while pretending there was interest from third parties to purchase participations in GNO, yet these third parties would not even buy it below NAV. Reading a result in which 78% of non-team holders signalled they want a path to realize NAV as a mandate to ignore an adequate exit solution and increase spending is not a tenable position. It is the precise inverse of what was voted for, and it confirms the concern that motivated this proposal: that operational discretion at Gnosis Ltd is being exercised without regard to the tokenholders the DAO exists to serve.

We will give leadership a week to reflect on this striking result and consider whether they genuinely accept its implications. If they do, and wish to engage on shaping the next proposal to protect non-team GNO holders, we are ready to work with them. If leadership continues to disregard the outcome, we will have no choice but to bring forward a further proposal without their input.

We trust that there will be no additional spending bruteforced through by these founder-held tokens, against the spirit of a decentralized DAO. Defensive voting with 385k GNO over disagreements on mechanism is one thing. Using that same concentration to force non-consensual spending increases against a vote that just produced a 78% non-team signal for value return is quite another, and would be impossible to reconcile with any claim that this is a tokenholder-governed organization.

We look forward to engaging further with GNO holders to shape the proposal. Whether you are a long-term holder or a new holder, please reach out to provide input.

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@limitbreak @illosbyhoon are you guys joking? you raised how much for this shit?

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@StaniKulechov why my eth is frozen on base since day one?

[Ξ Hirschi @s36199]

@TreeNewsFeed what? just use raised money to pay dividends. what an idiot.