Historian of 19th c. US at Uni of Iceland. Prev @HCAatEdinburgh. PhD @Camericanist. Forthcoming book on the Scientific-Military State w UChicago Press in 2026
Sveinn M. Jóhannesson, author of THE SCIENTIFIC-MILITARY STATE, discusses American imperialism, science, and social hierarchy on @campus_american. https://t.co/bpVbbMdVZU
Great to meet with Halla Gunnarsdóttir, leader of the VR Union, during my visit to Iceland to discuss the need for a new social contract between business, state and labour to embed equity in industrial strategy from the start.
More on the role of labour in modern industrial strategy ➡️ https://t.co/Yggg3VS9Jv
Glad to send this piece out into the world. It uses Iceland as a lens to knit together literatures on interwar origins of austerity, invention of the economy, international economic governance, and racialized hierarchy of international finance.
https://t.co/PWZeWlHxLM
Glad to send this piece out into the world. It uses Iceland as a lens to knit together literatures on interwar origins of austerity, invention of the economy, international economic governance, and racialized hierarchy of international finance.
https://t.co/PWZeWlHxLM
And here is the preview program for our RUG-NUPI workshop on "Global Histories of International Thought and Geopolitical Concepts". So much to look forward to!
Thank you to guest speakers and institutional partners for making this possible - watch this space...
@nils_gilman @markyzaguirre@shadihamid Iceland, here, as a permanent US "protectorate" and not included in what is called a federated "United States of Scandinavia"! How fascinating!
@DaelNorwood@SeanVanatta Fascinating! Even some of the language quoted in Sean's abstract is identical to the 1830s in connection with military engineers. Clearly a pattern of governance going on here.
@RrjohnR Happy to be corrected, but the military? The officer corps? As I recall it, Frymer ditches the army for land policy and “privatization” of violence. And there isn’t much cited in Rao on the military per se (no Watson or Skelton, e.g.). Violence is a much broader question.
@NBarreyre @whsieh@RrjohnR@matthewstoller Yes. There is some stuff on the "administrative state" and "big government." But apart from Skelton (and, by extention, Watson), rather little on the military. And they would actually fit nicely with your and Lemarcier's critique of Novak as replacing one anomaly with another.