saelworld

[The British Prince @freedom_007__]

I will never forget that when Prince Phillip was in hospital, Meghan and Harry continued with their disingenuous and lack of empathy Oprah interview.

When Prince Harry’s Grandfather was dying, they were so mean and childish. At this point, I knew they didn’t have the intelligence, understanding or statesmanship to be leaders on the world stage, and Meghan’s plan was always to drag Harry to California.

Emotionally mature adults would have had conversations and dealt with issues in private as a family. But Meghan Markle didn’t care; she was out for revenge, so she sat with Lie-Oprah and orchestrated a smear campaign to attack Harry’s family because she needed an excuse as to why they left; it had to be the Royal Family and not her who was chasing Hollywood fame and money. (BTW, Harry messed up and said on Oprah that his family were very welcoming to Meghan, “my father, my brother,Kate they were all very welcoming, better than I expected”. We know he got an earful after filming)
They told so many blatant lies and purposely gave answers without context so haters of the RF would create false narratives. What was more sad is that Queen Elizabeth II had to deal with this unnecessary and unfair fallout while her beloved husband for 73 years was dying.

I will never forget the nasty hashtags and content the Sussex Squad posted after this; disgusting. Most of the British public supported Harry and Meghan leaving if it was what Harry wanted and made him happy, but after that disastrous interview, the public mood soon shifted to shock and anger. A lot of people were done with the two privileged, selfish brats.

Let’s be clear: Meghan didn’t have mental health issues, she couldn’t take the lack of control, she couldn’t sue every newspaper that printed nonsense but had some truth to it, wanted to merch her connection to the RF and she couldn’t handle the high level of scrutiny or deliver the standard of responsibility that was expected from her.

Doria her mother was an alleged social worker but didn’t help her 🤨, and Harry had his therapist on speed dial but didn’t help her 🤨 he even said on Oprah that he didn’t tell his family because he felt ashamed. So if the family wasn’t told, they can’t be blamed for anything; plus she had plenty of access to help if she needed or wanted it. Her fabricated story had so many holes.

The worst part of that interview is how she lied about the colour of Archie’s skin, the question that didn’t happen the way her manipulative mind painted it out to be and the Duo told a complete different story when interviewed separately that lie-Oprah didn’t pushback on.

If Harry had cared for his Grandparents, he would have never done that lying interview.

What was heartbreaking is that Prince Phillip went to his grave thinking the world believed Meghan and Harry’s lies and didn’t get to the part where most of the world realised that Recollections May Vary.

When Prince Phillip died, I knew Meghan Markle was a narcissist. Harry was displaying tendencies as only a narcissistic person would continue attacking a family at this low point and have this level of lack of empathy or self awareness.

They created an unnecessary media storm and then played the victim when they could have just gone and lived the private life they claimed they wanted with their millions of pounds in the bank.

Queen Elizabeth II had a broken heart, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex didn’t care. They continued to brief the media with lies, disinformation and grift off the titles HMTLQ had gifted them.

I will never forget the lead-up to the late Duke of Edinburgh’s death and what followed; words can’t comprehend the level of narcissism, disrespect and disgusting behaviour displayed by two ungrateful, spoilt and cruel cosplaying humanitarians.

Rest in peace, Prince Phillip (World War II veteran) and thank you for your 70+ years of service to our country. @DofE @WWF

[Canellecitadelle @Canellelabelle]

What a cringe fest...
Harry took part in a podcast and the podcasters, trying to make fun of him, asked him about his current occupation. Harry responded: "Full time dad, British army veteran, Prince of England, Duke. But for today I don't know, what do you want. Duke? We'll go with Duke, yeah."
Yikes😬
This convoluted "Linkedin answer", translates in real life, into one word: "unemployed".
More accurately, Harry is currently a "full-time Hasbeen"😏
Bringing the Army and his past royal life in the discussion is all the more cringe that Harry officially left the Army in June 2015. He was 30 years old.
He officially stopped being a working royal in March 2020. He was 35 years old.
Now months-shy of his 42 birthday, Harry sit on a podcast and announce to the world that since leaving the RF, 6 years ago, and the Military, 11 years ago, he has become a "decorated hasbeen" without purpose, accomplishments nor a career to show for it😵‍💫
The bleak paradox of his answer is that when asked about his present life, Harry answered by pointing to his past life as a Royal🔥
Thus, Harry admitted out loud that the "Prince" in front of his name is all he ever was worth, all he is worth and all he ever will be worth. How pathetic and depressing😵‍💫
It is uncanny how, despite being the Heir, William has always strive to build a name for himself as "William", OUTSIDE of being a "Prince of the UK" or "Diana's son".
You will never hear William remind anyone that he is a royal or boast about it. That level of Vulgarity and low class only exists in Harry's DNA.
William always goes out of his way to use his given name and attempt to be as normal as possible, to not stand out🔥
He has proved that there is much more to him than the "Prince" in front of his name by creating a legacy for himself as the first ever Heir to hold a regular civilian job as a rescue Pilot in the Air Ambulance.
William is further recognised for his work in mental health, in conservation against illegal Wildlife, in the environment and now in homelessness, besides being a devoted father and husband👌🏽
With Harry, it is the complete opposite. Being a "Prince" is all he cares about and he goes out of his way, to remind the world that he is NOT like us. When asked about his job, he replies that he is a "Prince of England" and a "Duke"🤡
It seems Harry's worst fear in life, is to be mistaken for a commoner or a regular person..😏
By his own actions and words, Harry has proven how vain and insecure he is. He craves the royal accolades and demands the royal recognition and privileges.
He has made the "prince" in front of his name, his entire identity because outside of that, he is no one and brings nothing else to the plate. After all, everything he got in Life, he got it thanks to the "Prince" in front of his name to include the wife he married..😏
Well and so, people move on from their past, because they have a future to look forward to, new horizons to explore, better opportunities that have yet to come.
Harry's answer to the podcaster explains why he will never be able to close the door on his past and simply move on with his life. For Harry, his best has already come and gone. It was the royal life he was handed at birth and that he has now ruined for himself🤷🏽‍♀️
Now, He is spending the rest of his life circling back to that past and defining himself by that past, unable to let go, like a bitter and resentful person does.
In that, "Rinse and repeat" has become Harry's future☕️

[Royally Sage @sage1411]

Considering he is not a working royal, he’s just unemployed with a useless title. He’s just trying to infer his title means a job is attached to it. Pretty manipulative and misleading.

[Tara @Tara1704138611]

@ValePiccinini For the obvious reasons you are already aware of.
Engagement farming.

[🌸Mari E.🌸🐈‍⬛🐈 @mari_2527]

I've read so many people angry about a meeting that was bound to happen sooner or later. The difference is that it happened when the King wanted it and under his rules and conditions, not under the conditions of those who, for seven years, tried to impose their narrative. In the end, those who swore they needed nothing from the Royal Family ended up accepting the King's rules. They came crawling back.

After years of interviews, documentaries, a book filled with attacks,calling him a bad father, claiming he never took him for a bike ride, sowing doubts about his paternity, and accusing the institution of racism, accusations and defamation that also targeted the Princess of Wales and were amplified by the book by former Harkles spokesman Omid Scobie, the meeting finally took place. There were no photos, no exclusives, no leaks, and no media spectacle. It was a private meeting. Exactly as it should have been.

And that says a lot. Because if the real goal was for those children to meet their grandfather, that moment had to happen away from the cameras and the media frenzy. Children are not responsible for their parents' decisions or the narratives their parents have constructed over the years to portray themselves as victims.

The most interesting thing is that this week some people had been repeating the exact same argument for days: that Charles was a bad father, a racist, that their idols didn't need the King and the evil RF because they already had another family that loved them. Well, reality has done its work again. Another narrative crumbles.

Camilla's presence was also significant. After being the target of countless personal attacks, she stood by the King, supporting him. A gesture of unity after years of public denigration.

And no, this doesn't mean the King betrayed William either. That's another narrative that should be erased. William is a mature man. He perfectly understands the difference between a family decision and an institutional one. He doesn't need to tell his father who he can meet with. He respects Charles and the decisions he makes as a father and grandfather, and he's obviously supporting him. That's precisely what a mature person does, not someone driven by resentment or ego.

What also remains unchanged is Harry's status. He relinquished his official role, and a private meeting doesn't alter that. The King received him as a father, not as a monarch, granting him privileges or anything of the sort. That distinction will continue to exist.

In the end, those who for years insisted they didn't need the Royal Family ended up accepting the King's conditions. No cameras. No exclusives. No media circus. And perhaps for some, that's the most disappointing thing: that, once again, reality far surpassed the narrative they may have had prepared. Well done!

[Toni Smith🤴💂‍♂️ @ToniSmith_UK]

The absolute desperation of calling a total public quarantine 'winning.' They traveled on the King's schedule, complied with the King's rules, sat in a room with Queen Camilla, and were denied a single pixel of media currency. If getting completely de-platformed from the public eye for an afternoon is a victory, let's hope they keep 'winning' exactly like this. 👑🤫

[Longsally AKA Sue Smith @longsally]

Meghan Markle will not accept an apology from her father for one indiscretion but is willing to go crawling back to the same family she said was racist and gave her suicidal ideation. Very interesting….

[𓆩Mrs.W𓆪 @Katrnish]

Nothing humbles you like desperation. Bringing ur kids to meet the "pedo protector" you accused of racism and ur "evil" stepmother. The same two ur fans say made ur mother's life miserable, at the place where she felt it like "a return to prison". Was the jam deal part of it too?

[Surfing_fox @SurfingFxx]

@storiesbyjemay @Telegraph says the King left Oxford University at 3.30 pm. As far as I know, afternoon is considered to between 12 pm to around 5pm. The King also needed the time to arrive at Highgrove from Oxford. So far as I can calculate the meeting was only around 1 hour most probably.

[The Rumble Online @theRumble9]

The fact that a female journalist days ago revealed how a Prince - who was once 3rd in line to the British Throne - dropped a “white pill” in her mouth to see if he could trust her… and to hear silence from most of the main stream media and charities that help protect women tell us everything we need to know about the unwillingness to really dive into the behaviour of MEN in positions of power. Deeply disappointing

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

What’s with the relentless media briefings? Is Meghan really that desperate for headlines?

She can come to the UK whenever she likes. No one would even know if every little detail wasn’t being fed to the press. If it’s meant to be private, why announce every change of plan?

Amazing what eye-watering legal bills can do. Suddenly the UK isn’t so terrible after all, and the family they spent years attacking are worth visiting again.

Imagine the sacrifice… Meghan in the UK away from the cameras. That must be an incredibly difficult burden for someone who never seems to miss a photo opportunity.

I guess we’re only one flight away from another “thank you for your service” story. 😌

Welcome back, Meghan. So brave, especially away from the cameras. 🙄

[According2Taz @according2_taz]

So Charlotte Griffiths has revealed that this WAS a set up! The meeting was arranged and deliberately leaked to the media so they could blame the Palace. They organised the paparazzi to capture the private meeting with the Kings staff, so they could play victim.

No wonder Meredith Maines quit her job and looks guilty here! She was the only one who didn’t looked shocked at the paparazzi intrusion. I guess we now know why.

All these reporters who push that Harry and Meghan want a reconciliation are either total delusional or on their payroll. It’s clear Harry and Meghan are still waging a one sided war against the Royal Family. They never stopped, they just changed tactics because the Royals won’t let them anywhere near them.

REMOVE THE TRAITORS FROM THE ROYAL FAMILY WEBSITE!

[Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧 @QLoTII]

🚨BREAKING NEWS

Charlotte Griffith has now revealed that it was Prince Harry and Meghan Markle that leaked the news about the meeting at a cafe near Clarence House, with Tobyn Andrae.

Harry and Meghan are the LEAKS!!

[Surfing_fox @SurfingFxx]

Charlotte Griffiths bares it all, from the very beginning. She reveals almost everything including that it was H&M's PR who leaked the meeting of the aides from both the sides, only to later on leak again on @Telegraph & misled by implying that Charles's side leaked it.

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

So Harry can spend years publicly humiliating his family on the world’s biggest stage, but not getting his preferred room is somehow the Palace humiliating him?

It seems some royal commentators have one definition of “humiliation” for Harry and a completely different one for everyone else.

Besides, nobody needs to humiliate Harry. He manages that all on his own.

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

Prince Harry:

“Stop invading my privacy.”

Also Prince Harry: Here’s 400+ pages of my family’s private life, a six-hour Netflix documentary, a string of tell-all, self-serving interviews, and years of publicly airing family grievances.
That’ll be millions, thanks.

“Climate change is an emergency.”

Boards another private jet.

“I want reconciliation.”

Publishes another interview attacking the very people he claims he wants to reconcile with.

“I hate the media.”

Also Prince Harry: Calls them the moment he has a book, documentary, self-serving narrative, PR campaign, or lawsuit to promote.

“I just want a normal life.”

Moves to Hollywood, signs multi-million-dollar media deals and never stops talking about being royal.

Prince Harry doesn’t have principles. He has a revolving menu of grievances, victim narratives, and profit opportunities that he rotates depending on what’s paying, what’s trending, or what keeps him in the spotlight.

[Sabirah Lohn 💕🦕🦖 @SabirahLohn]

Thank you Third!
“Prince Harry and other claimants reportedly tried to reach a settlement with the Daily Mail publisher just a few weeks before the start of their high-stakes legal battle.
According to reports in The Times, the group used an intermediary to approach Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) ahead of the Duke giving evidence.
The report says ANL rejected the offer outright.”

[Allexmarie @AllexmarieHoll1]

Let’s not forget the dragon slayer aka Mr Mischief still had another court case pending.

Sentebale, the African youth charity co-founded by Prince Harry, has filed a High Court defamation lawsuit against him and former trustee Mark Dyer.

[Allexmarie @AllexmarieHoll1]

And let’s not forget that the dragon slayer himself appeared to commit perjury. He blatantly lied on oath about Mr Mischief and his flirty relationship with a journalist Anyone else caught telling lies like that might have found themselves in prison. However because it’s him it must have been “whitewashed”

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

My Take: Prince Harry Lost. So He Did What He Does Best: Blamed the System and Called It a “Whitewash.”

Calling the ruling a “whitewash” ignores what actually happened. This wasn’t a case thrown out after a brief hearing. The trial lasted 11 weeks. The judge heard witnesses, considered documents, listened to cross-examination and then explained, in detail, why the evidence didn’t prove these specific claims against the Mail.

Harry also seems to blur the line between what has been proven in other cases and what had to be proven in this one. His previous victory against Mirror Group doesn’t automatically mean every publisher is liable for every allegation. Different defendant. Different evidence. Different articles. Every case stands or falls on its own facts.

The joint statement also suggests there is “one rule for newspapers and another for claimants.” That argument falls apart when you remember Harry has already won hacking claims and received substantial damages where the evidence supported them. The legal system didn’t suddenly invent a different rule because this case ended differently. The evidence simply didn’t persuade the court.

Another flaw in the statement is the implication that because the judge didn’t accept every allegation, he must have ignored evidence or simply believed journalists without question. That’s not what the judgment says. The court examined the evidence and concluded it wasn’t sufficient to establish liability against this defendant for these particular articles. That’s not a cover-up. It’s how civil litigation works.

Baroness Lawrence’s fight for justice for her son has always commanded respect. The Mail itself famously campaigned for justice in Stephen Lawrence’s case. That’s why I find it disappointing to see her name attached to a joint statement describing this judgment as a “whitewash.” When a court concludes the evidence didn’t prove the claims before it, presenting that outcome as proof of systemic failure risks undermining a cause that has always deserved serious public respect.

Harry, meanwhile, has turned his battles with the press into interviews, a memoir, documentaries and an ongoing public campaign. Demanding accountability from everyone else, while dismissing an adverse judgment as a “whitewash” when the evidence doesn’t survive judicial scrutiny, isn’t the principled stand he seems to think it is.

In the end, this statement says far more about Harry’s response to losing than it does about the judgment itself. When he wins, the courts are proof that justice works. When he loses, they’re evidence the system is broken. That’s not accountability. It’s accepting the rule of law only when it delivers the verdict you wanted.