Sahandyman

Physics Lover | Amateur Linguist | Political Junkie

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@esjesjesj Should also be noted that this study was done on liberal arts colleges, which host about 5% of US undergrads (hardly widespread indoctrination there)

[The Davis Lab @The_Davis_Lab]

Shoutout to our senior undergrad Ken on getting highest honors on his undergraduate honors thesis!!!🎉🤩

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@TheBabylonBee @benshapiro Daily show did it better six years ago:

https://t.co/oWM1UW4iNz

[The Davis Lab @The_Davis_Lab]

We had a great time at the 13th annual Southeast Enzyme Conference this weekend at Georgia State!! Our own @Sahandy_man even took first place in the poster sessions!🎊🏆

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@TheKavernacle I think it's two men, judging on the profile and tweets

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@davidfrum Is there somewhere we can get more news on this?

[The Davis Lab @The_Davis_Lab]

Sam’s Typical Thursday Agenda:

1. Set up some crystal screens
2. Lab group meeting
3. Open for the @Indigo_Girls
4. Introduce Sahand to his idols
5. Work on quad sheets

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@sarangop Monster Math

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@SenToddYoung @CBP Magnus is saying you need to define crisis. You say a "crisis" speaks to a level of urgency. He says no one thinks it's more urgent than he does, and then you say "urgent" means it's less serious than a "crisis." You were the one who defined a crisis as urgent!

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@wskip99 @IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience 👍

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@wskip99 @IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience No need to get angry. Just letting you know you should do your due diligence before making claims.

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@JunkScience

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@wskip99 @IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience If by "numerous studies" you mean "a single, non-peer-reviewed study by Anthony Watts at a libertarian think tank," then I've already heard about it and am not convinced

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@wskip99 @IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience Would love to see your source on that lofty claim

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@1860rm @JunkScience If you take the temperature over a statistically significant sample of spots a large number of times, and do that over time, you can certainly see how the temperature of the Earth increases. Not sure how that's controversial

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@LindsayyuleS @JunkScience I'm sorry but I don't understand how these prove global temperature is unmeasurable. To my knowledge, no one in this thread mentioned 15°C, so that came out of nowhere. And it's not just stations that read these temperatures, it's satellites and boats too

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@rczeranko @IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience Feel free to clarify

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@IanHugh07940666 @JunkScience There are definitely thermometers that read more precise than 0.2°C. In any case, that number is an average of a very large number of measurements. You can minimize random error when you take a lot of measurements

[Sahandyman @Sahandy_man]

@the_mdwessell @KEVINC_PEIAG @benshapiro Do you have an article or report that says this? Been trying to find it