howdy i'm oneirayaitch
oneayaitch on discord (less active there)
utdrtwt and saikitwt mostly (i'll just talk about most stuff i like though)
alt if i get locked:
@1AHBackup
private account:
@privayaitch
(pals only)
not putting images of stuff i like cuz SCREW YOU!!!!!
@asphy_xiah i mean when someone posts abt their attraction to a character who is designed to look like a child (and tries to call that attraction normal) i think that's valid reason to be distrustful and to call them weird
the whole lolicon discourse basically just boils down to this:
yes they're just drawings and no actual children are being harmed but the fact that shit that's obviously styled to look like a child is what gets u goin and you aggressively try to paint it as normal is weird asf
keep in mind the "no actual children harmed" refers to sm1 assaulting an actual child irl (this is what lolicons think of when they say smth like that)
the harm is not limited to that however when you post abt it on public accounts as this person put it
https://t.co/2uVUZwLv6T
@saiiteru yeah except actual children are being harmed when these freaks post their fetishes on public accounts. if you’re going to be a pedophile and proudly claim you “care about real children” i expect you to keep your bullshit private or completely to yourself
people are fully in their right to call u a fucking weirdo and not think children would be safe around you if ur this open abt ur attraction and attack people who call out the fact that it is weird
@IdestityV lowkey i didn't think of that specific scenario i had in mind what lolicons usually think of when they say that and that's when someone assaults an actual kid or grooms an actual kid
thanks for bringing dis up ill quote it so it's further up in replies
@Uchihaanti1@futabawuver yeah 💔 im mostly arguing from that point lolicons make all the time bcs like even if that was true they're still weird as shit and pedophilic in their behaviour and people are completely right to call that out
@Uchihaanti1@futabawuver oh i agree it's js that objectively as long as they actually do keep it strictly (and i do actually mean strictly. nothing even remotely related to irl children) fictional no real children are harmed
because of the culture around it tho that's nigh impossible 😭
@bomoris2020 yes the duck test can fail im js saying that if ur quacking like a duck and moving like a duck you can't be surprised when people call you a duck or think of you as a duck when all ur doing is acting like a duck
that last bit is also not at all related to the convo
can't reply bcs of post limit if that's the case why even reply to me with that 😭
Anyways being a lolicon is like constantly fantasising about killing someone and saying all the time you'd like to kill something or attack some crash doll dummy
u can't be shocked when people
@saiiteru did i call you out for spamming "pedophile"? i said your KIND not you. learn how to read EVERYTHING and not for your bias
still agree it weird btw
@GoForAllroy I never said dat they aren't pedos actually
they're all functionally pedos to me bcs why are things that are specifically styled to look like kids what gets u goin
it's js that as long as it's kept to fiction yes no real children are harmed. That doesn't change te fact that-
@bomoris2020 again it's a matter of the duck test. Yes, YOU might find it annoying as shit, but again it is a matter of the duck test for ppl. A person cannot be a lolicon and be shocked when people constantly call them a pedophile because of what the culture around lolicon entails
@futabawuver in all technicality as long as it is kept strictly to fiction (and i do mean STRICTLY) it does not harm children irl
however the whole culture around this makes it really hard for these niggas to actually keep it to fiction thanks to what it entails