PubAlert! Introducing new @Journal_Of_Comm publication: “Is artificial intelligence more persuasive than humans? A meta-analysis”, by @HuangGuanxiong, @SaiWang1. Read here: https://t.co/GyebesJe99
Manuscript rejected after 3 months because the journal couldn’t find ONE single reviewer. I hear this is an increasingly common issue across journals.
Academics, if we’re not supporting each other to move our fields forward, what are we even doing?
@AcademicChatter
If you spend a lot of time copying text from PDFs into Word like me, I hope this tip might be useful! If the PDF ends up broken up over lots of lines, there's no need to fix it manually. Just go to find and replace, type ^p into find, and one space into replace. Pics below :)
BREAKING: The heretofore-hybrid #ica21 conference has been converted to 100% virtual. More info in letter from @LSawyerED @olivermb & @claesdevreese here (bc the ICA website has intermittent service issues this week): https://t.co/3ixVD3nU1s.
How to revise:
As an editor and author I have seen many revised papers return to journals. Given effort, most go well (ie step toward acceptance). Some go pear-shaped. I’ve slowly improved and have an approach known by my group as the ‘Breakspear method”. Here is its essence
Digital Communication Media Use and Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis | Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication | Oxford Academic - https://t.co/MLBeFH98Vg
Many Americans place higher confidence in their own ability to detect made-up news and information than they do the public overall https://t.co/ovVk4vfuX5
“Is That My Friend or an Advert? The Effectiveness of Instagram Native Advertisements Posing as Social Posts” by Benjamin K Johnson, Bridget Potocki, and Jolanda Veldhuis, JCMC https://t.co/cnb7VKfaGH
My modal comment as a referee: Delete pages 1-12 & get on with telling us what your research is about already. (I.e., people you're citing already have their own papers. Include them only if they help you make your point. If you just want to be nice, send flowers.)