@MichaelFilipiuk I found I can design in code but it feels very different than on a canvas. Agents make a thing from a high level brief and then I treat it like a big chunk of rock to chisel into something coherent via small prompts.
I don't trust my output when it comes too "easy" ... there's no way I just happened to nail it with iteration #5
surely it takes at least one mental breakdown to make something great... so I always keep going and even try out the "shitty" ideas for benchmarking
i spend more time in figma now than ever and i love it
noodling with frames. uncovering whats in my brain. finding the correct idea. and when it clicks into place it feels so satistfying
The irony of ownership in a company context is that usually it also requires sharing it with someone else and giving up some of it for your goals to move forward
I analyzed the range of ratings on booking sites and it's pretty crazy
Airbnb goes just from 4.5 to 5 with a median of 5!
But most others aren't better, they all range from about 4 to 5, and almost all have a median of 4.25, with not many scores outside of it!
The best site in terms of honest ratings is actually Yelp, whatever they're doing it's working, it shows an actual normal distribution and ratings you can trust
Hotelist itself is a normal distribution with median at 3.5, which was my goal, most stays are average/okay which I'd consider 3.5/5
Here's my perspective and thoughts on burning out.
If you can burn out that means you can definitely also burn bright. Don't hesitate to take time for yourself in order to create something amazing after.
Keep learning, keep growing, keep shining motherf*ckers! 🔥
Most teams get scope backwards.
Scope isn’t an input to product development. It’s an output.
Your input is the problem. Figure out what a great solution requires. That’s your scope.