@0xaporia@semtrades The criticism that EW counts are changed after being invalidated is plainly stupid. It's an admission of being wrong, not an attempt to be right.
*There are obviously a lot of terrible EW analysts out there .
There are also some great ones @GregaHorvatFX for one
@0xaporia@semtrades This is just a misunderstanding of how to use it though. EW, like any other tool, is just that a tool to guide where you think price is most likely to go. It's not a trading strategy. You then try to look for trading setups guided by it.
@zachxbt@CryptoBran_@zoomerfied@inversebrah Hopefully look into the MMA Ido as well. Was advisor talking up twitter, discord .. dumps immediately on release.... deletes all mentions. Ridicules everyone.
@FYPFanzine@FlobbyWirtzmino@LfcWrld Wissa got his move etc... Yeah Newcastle had to pay ยฃ55m for him, same one year left on his contract. All on Liverpool
@scoutingindoors Could be perhaps that u19s job is actually more appealing. Obviously wants to move into senior management in any case, so always would've been temporary
@Jonas_ALA@GMX_IO Otherwise if you are pricing GLP tokens on exploit date it would mean the bounty is fully paid in GLP owners lost price appreciation rather than Dao treasury? In any case I recognise the complexity involved just feels like a far too common playbook
@Jonas_ALA@GMX_IO My understanding was that the exploiter didn't return the profit from the price apprecition? GLP by definition, as a basket of tokens, fluctuated with the market so being made whole isn't a dollar amount but rather repayment of the tokens lost.