@missdaisyfdoo It's almost like a "catch me if you can" story, for one. The incredible lies, and the fact he could evade consequences for so long. And yes, the evidently corrupt (and i would argue racist) intent behind hiring him.
@jmc_fire I guess the students got some real life education of CRT in action. Perhaps they could look at their textbooks, then at their professor and ponder on the fact that this is what a CRT-dominated world will feel like ALL the time.
@NeilThin This is a strawman. People are not against social justice or progress. We had that before DEI/EDI. There is a particular philosophy of identitiy politics and reverse discrimination arising from CRT which is pernicious in its impact on institutions which is at issue.
@LeoKearse Those within the system who raised the alarm were intimidated and shut down, as were journalists. If you shut down all "legitimate" sources of raising issues, what do you expect will happen?
@PhilipHensher The fundamental flaw is reducing people to labels as per their identity. Even if people are discriminated as a group, the answer cannot be reverse discrimination as a group. This is actually the lazy answer, designed to make the doer feel good rather than solve the problem.
@lancekthompson The whole CRT is based on the assumption that truth is subjective - there isn't one truth, there is only my truth or your truth.
If we leave the noise aside, this is the core philosophical difference between the two sides of this debate - so we should not be surprised at all.
@Blank43441508@soniasodha Actually she has been one of the few sane voices in Guardian / Observer for a long time. Ironically (given the Arday context) she may be the token anti-DEI journalist at Guardian.
@soniasodha My empathy for the student is reduced when I reflect that the subject in question was probably CRT. Looks like everyone got what they were looking for.
@hippoontherd@soniasodha@WingsScotland To paraphrase: If it was harassment, you will call it harassment. Which is a tautology.
The question before us is whether the act of investigation itself is tantamount to harassment.
@hippoontherd@soniasodha@WingsScotland So if they were investigating a politician (for instance for rent fraud), and the politician complained of being harassed, the police should call the journalist and ask them to stop?
@Sam_Axiom Some justification is needed to finally take the limit in the second proof - i think you need do the ratio test to show the series converges.
@yuanyi_z If a politician is strongly identified to be against X (e.g. abortion) and then is found to be doing X, they do get outed quickly.
Academicians claim to hold authority on a subject - a claim based on integrity and knowledge. So of course when these are questioned it's news.