@Tyr_911@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Then that same logic would apply to a woman. If a man can, why can’t a woman have a non-sexual reason for being topless to.. why does the exact same act become sexual only because of the person’s sex..
and regardless your nipples are still out when you go out shirtless😭✌️
@ttrsux@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai lol. Those are two different definitions. Sexual selection and being inherently sexual aren’t the same thing. A trait can evolve through mate preference without it being inherently sexual. Those are related ideas, but they aren’t identical, and you’d still need to show how one
@pxnyta@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Sex, sex organs,orientation,sexuality..? Sexual desire, intimacy..? Breasts have no biological sexual function.(for sexual arousal reasons) However they can be perceived or viewed as sexual which in certain contexts which isn’t the same as something being inherently sexual.
@abeeybaby@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai lol, aren’t those two different topics..?Js bc i believe they aren’t inherently sexual doesn’t mean I think every beach should allow nudity?? Whether breasts are inherently sexual and what clothing policy’s beaches have are separate questions.
@christiansaling@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai What’s nonsense about it? You had a lot to say to me earlier?? is this truly a whole bunch of bullshit or is this something you just don’t understand?
@christiansaling@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Well.. I asked for an explanation. Just a minute ago you were very confident?? Insulting me.. cussing at me?? Where’s that energy now?? And then when I asked for an explanation.. silence? there’s a difference between things being perceived a sexual and being inherently sexual.
@ttrsux@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Biologically, a woman’s breasts have a clear non-sexual function. Their natural purpose is producing milk to feed infants. Sexual attraction to them doesn’t change that..because they aren’t inherently sexual. I’m not arguing the fact where ppl find them attractive or not.
@ttrsux@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai I obviously agree. I don’t get to decide what other people find attractive. Many people are attracted to breast and that’s a real experience, when I also experience. But I am talking about if they are inherently sexual. Not whether they can be sexualized or found attractive 1/2
@christiansaling@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Well, I do like to argue and debate. It’s fun. But please explain how I’m wrong. They are not inherently sexual. They have been heavily sexualized. All you did was bring up trans people, call me stupid, and cuss at me.. and you have provided no explanation.
@LJersey77@QueerFamlove no. You’re actually supposed to mind your business.. there’s nothing wrong with two consenting adults, loving each other. In no way is it any of your business
@christiansaling@WeeklySoapbox@seyikanbai Wow. Burn. Really got me there😭✌️ I believe they can be sexual in some contexts. However I do not believe they are inherently sexual.
@Jeffrey11317371@Poor_Bandit@Black_Action Ur so gross, ur insults aren’t even original..go say this to someone’s face instead of hiding behind a screen like a limp dick loser😭✌️fucking pussy
@shiny49549@Satans_Employee@TheGr8Assholio@MibshaD So the victim should have to carry their rapists baby to term?? Even if it’s a kid?? Because forcing someone to carry out a pregnancy is also violent and doesn’t save anyone.
They'll call a 10-year-old rape victim a "mother."
They'll call a non-viable fetus a "baby."
They'll call a life-saving abortion "murder."
This isn't medicine. It's propaganda to punish women for having sex.