@femfederation@sunofdarkchild And now Claremont vetoed Mystique being bisexual and is trying to change her to transgender rep and also Destiny and Mystique are now abusive to eachother as per his Blue Origins agenda. All written by men to serve Nightcrawler by the way
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild As for Amanda, Claremont seems to target adopted girls specifically to invalidate them. Amanda and Rogue have both been pushed aside for Nightcrawler or invalidated for example
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild Well from what I've heard Claremont has been more supportive of Rogue and Magneto over Rogue and Gambit which says it all.
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild He also has that women hurt other women trope he likes doing like Rogue to Carol, Emma to Storm and now with Mystique and Destiny too. Usually of a sexually implied nature
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild No Inferno was a poorly researched moment that does not take sexual assault and its impacts and consequences seriously. So much so that when Claremont got backlash for it he tried backtracking saying it was "just" molestation. Which Carol was also subjected to in Rogue's mind
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild Oh he's definitely not a feminist. He doesn't put his male characters through half the abuse of women and as proven by Blue Origin, he has no problem with women being violated to boost male characters he likes. The bar is that low for you
@femfederation@sunofdarkchild You mean getting Rogue gang sexually assaulted in Genosha and having her sidelined for her brother? Abusing Carol Danvers? Putting Kitty with Colossus and cheering on Rogue with Magneto? Having Kurt (his fave) sleep with Amanda his adopted sister? And changing Destique for Kurt?
@Ardyno12 Gambit is one of the best selling characters right now.
You could've picked on Cyclops, Mystique, Charles and Magneto.
You picked on him and showed how uncool you are