Que fundamento jurídico tem Moraes para continuar a mandar silenciar comentadores nas redes sociais? Essa lei deveria expirar no dia em que a eleição terminasse.
Alguém se importa se ele tem uma base legal para isso, ou apenas reverenciamos nosso monarca benevolente?
Morons are laughing about this because, first of all, they don’t understand that trial and error is how real science works. And second they’ve never achieved anything of value in their entire lives so they compensate by mocking those who are actually doing and innovating.
Fui entrar nos comentários da Choquei
Esse foi o erro, né?
Mas tinha lá gente zoando o Musk porque a Starship explodiu.
Vou nem comentar que era um teste e ele ter saído do chão era o objetivo, mas qual é a de você ser contra algo que beneficia literalmente toda a humanidade?
I recently designed an ecom landing page converting cold traffic at 4.4%
And I just recorded a 25-minute video going over the EXACT framework we used
This is easily worth $499, but I'm giving it away for FREE
Like + Comment "Video" and I'll send it to you
(must be following)
Existe agora, ou já existiu, uma democracia moderna onde um único juiz exerce o poder que Alexandre de Moraes possui no Brasil? Não consigo pensar em nenhum exemplo sequer próximo.
https://t.co/7z3JPFTdB0
Put another way: any politician demanding the power to dictate who can and can't speak on the internet is infinitely more dangerous than whoever they are trying to censor.
A key property of fascism is the union of state and corporate power to control the population.
The same worthless media liberals who never break stories, who never do any reporting, who just sit around mimicking each other every day - speaking only to and for one another in servitude to Dems - all write the same articles because they're all hive-minded empty herd animals.
The purpose of modern censorship is not to prevent people from hearing an idea. It is to delegitimize the idea in the mind of the public, and excommunicate the heretic who dared express it from polite society and the public square.
Aside from these made-up numbers: do you see how -- to Democratic Party politicians -- dictating to social media companies what they can and can't platform, how they must censor, the role Democratic politicians play in all this, is just assumed as normal?
Ten currently serving or just-elected members of the Brazilian Congress -- **ten** -- now have their social media accounts blocked, suspended, or banned by the same Supreme Court justice whom the NYT has twice suggested is consolidating authoritarian powers: Alexandre de Moraes:
@elonmusk As I said in that video broadcast, having "journalists" be the leading advocates for greater censorship - which they are - is as surreal as having the leading advocates of more cigarette smoking be cardiologists. It's a complete perversion of the values real journalists defend.
The argument that Ukraine "provoked" Putin by soliciting Western protection has the same reasoning defect as claiming that you "provoked" a burglar by installing a security system.