> That is why the demo is the wrong finish line. It only proves that something can be shown, not that it can be absorbed by a team.
https://t.co/Dhg3YfSVEJ
Google fue muy listo; usan los acelerómetros de miles de teléfonos Android cómo una red global de sismos, toda esa data se envía y Google logró una forma de detectar esas ondas a tiempo y enviar las alertas.
History's first trillionaire is a guy who catches rockets out of the sky with chopsticks and beams internet to every dead zone on the planet.
Same guy ships cars that drive themselves, humanoid robots for the factory floor, brain chips that let paralyzed people move a cursor with pure thought, and an AI running on a supercomputer his team stood up in months instead of years.
And the people crashing out about his net worth are doing it on the app he owns. The same app governments spent years trying to censor.
You cannot legislate a rocket into orbit.
@johannesmkx The donkey thing happened to fulfill a prophecy: "Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and victorious, lowly and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey." — Zechariah 9:9
The devil has no plans for me but eternal damnation, so whenever I find myself loving sin, I become seriously wary. That kind of love is love unto death. The thirst for stolen water is a snare for my soul. The only way out is an expulsive love for God that drains out inferior affections. This I must seek with all my heart.
The bottleneck has so quickly moved from code generation to code review that it is actually a bit jarring.
None of the current systems / norms are setup for this world yet.
🤯BREAKING: Alibaba just proved that AI Coding isn't taking your job, it's just writing the legacy code that will keep you employed fixing it for the next decade. 🤣
Passing a coding test once is easy. Maintaining that code for 8 months without it exploding? Apparently, it’s nearly impossible for AI.
Alibaba tested 18 AI agents on 100 real codebases over 233-day cycles. They didn't just look for "quick fixes"—they looked for long-term survival.
The results were a bloodbath:
75% of models broke previously working code during maintenance.
Only Claude Opus 4.5/4.6 maintained a >50% zero-regression rate.
Every other model accumulated technical debt that compounded until the codebase collapsed.
We’ve been using "snapshot" benchmarks like HumanEval that only ask "Does it work right now?"
The new SWE-CI benchmark asks: "Does it still work after 8 months of evolution?"
Most AI agents are "Quick-Fix Artists." They write brittle code that passes tests today but becomes a maintenance nightmare tomorrow. They aren't building software; they're building a house of cards.
The narrative just got honest: Most models can write code. Almost none can maintain it.
Earth review:
- Takes 3 years to unlock voice chat
- Tutorial takes 18 years
- Banned at level 60-80
- Can't respawn
- Pay to win
- Signing up takes 9 months
- Can't choose your own server or username
- Good graphics lagging sometimes
- Last battle royal 1930-1945, new one soon
us: we are struggling to figure out the best way to use coding agents, we don't have clarity yet
everyone else: our team is moving at speeds unheard of, all our PRs are ai generated, we've cleared 6 years of backlog
man we must really suck huh
✍️ 'In an increasingly materialistic world, Christianity can offer deeper meaning to a generation growing tired of superficiality' | Writes Celia Walden
Read more here ⤵️
https://t.co/KMeWoR8QrQ