Satflation⚡

Mises, Ron Paul, bitcoin...was happy half-Vulcan trying to live long and stack. Bcore threatened our savings. Now they must go. Simple logic.

[Jimmy Song (송재준) @jimmysong]

You either end up a Bitcoin maximalist or a clown. There's no in between.

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@ClioBitcoinBank @ungovbitcoin lmao fuck you

[BitcoinMania - BIP 110 @BitcoinMania___]

Posted for all Bitcoiners to see, without comment (this is a Core v30 person).

[HMLE @1hmle]

@adam3us @CaminaDrummer4 Core is prudent, conservative, and secure.

That's a good one Adam.

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@btcblockjams Dude, those sats literally will never be spent again. They have no value. They were sent to fake addresses to etch a stupid frog gif. No one has the keys. The sats are gone. Never coming back.

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@axexang @_colourorange @btcblockjams @MajorianBTC It can’t possibly be money. The 1,859 outputs of 330 sats will never be spent again. God I wish dust limit was 10x+

[Majorian / BIP-110 @MajorianBTC]

The net impact of Core 30 to date:

More large op_return spam, with the addition of a new attack vector against bitcoin.

Truly one of the most puzzling decisions made in Bitcoin Core's history.

[Luke Dashjr @LukeDashjr]

@adam3us @BryanBSolstin @Loriss65 @lukedewolf Your tweets are nonsense

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@bitsko_xt @sodiumbtc21 lol who cares?

[Beautyon @Beautyon_]

CORE HAS GONE MAD. DEACTIVATION IS THE WAY.

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@Laserman_21 @BitcoinKnots 🤮

[Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 @GrassFedBitcoin]

@geekigai I wish people concerned with slippery slopes would apply it the other way: what kind of precedent does it set if we only ever roll over for spam?

[Bitcoin is Ungovernable @ungovbitcoin]

100 %.

Stop arguing with bCore, just ridicule them

You would never argue with a toddler or a thief

[Parman BIP110 🔑 Bitcoin Self-Custody Mentor @parman_the]

Fuck spammers and the people that make excuses for them.

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@evoskuil Theft of what? They’re unspendable

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@sedited_ @evoskuil The unspendable ones.

I'm not familiar with the details of the cat, but etching with unspendable forever UTXOs is a tale as old as time. Steganography at its finest and my personal "favorite" type of spam, by far. I just wish dust limit was 5,000+.

https://t.co/0IMWNSAnE5

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

I scrolled by @mononautical post about weird frog gif stored on chain and saw “less than a hundred bucks!”

Newbies to spam dynamics like myself may not understand this type of “transaction” burns all outputs, sending UTXOs to unspendable addresses.

In other words, it cost a whopping ~$840, once we include the 613,470 sats burned (1,859 outputs of 330 sats). What misleading garbage!

The UTXO set is harmed, creating 1,859 outputs that will never be spent.

But the spammers get wrecked, wasting big money on nothing.

HODLers are the big winners, reaping the benefit of 0.000000029% deflation. Doesn’t sound like much, but adds up as the weirdos keep at it.

It’s definitely annoying graffiti style vandalism, but very costly for the perpetrators, not at all comparable to OP_RETURN, which allowed the freaks storing a Mechanic pic yesterday to pay only $120 for a bigger image and not burn anything.

Am I getting this right?

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@Beautyon_ Holy moly so bad lol. and wtf is Giamatti doing there at end?

[Satflation⚡ @satflation]

@Shireh0dl