JthanP

Believer 🙏, Designer, Artist, Accountant, Legal Analyst,Trader. Officianado in Extreme Sports/Marital Arts & Fitness...also: I love helping people & traveling!

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@Glitch_Trades @dweltrowskik Skylit it is Glitch, you're earning respect from all traders out there!

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@Liathetrader I did believe this that this was coming, but I believe your original thesis isn't invalidated Lia. For anyone reading, Lia is one of the traders (along with Glitch & Blonde, & Eliant) that I reference most. If it disappeared below 610, that can be a DC bounce perhaps.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@Glitch_Trades If you start a private site, please pet me jump on...I want to tip you or any cause you have kind Sir.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@Glitch_Trades On my $meta trade today))

[JthanP @JthanJac]

You don't sound arrogant, just ignorant friend. Sorry, I'm not trying to sound offensive, but please don't mistske my directness for a lack of depth. Ultimately, you see intrinsic value in the R & D of meta's ai Capex expansion as a good thing...as stakeholder, I only see this through the prism of financial gain. Again, I'm not a communist, but a bottom-line capitalist. So far, this has not translated into direct material gain, at least not when juxtaposed to the QQQ for the last 2 years. You're arguing theory, I'm spitting facts. We are not arguing the same topic it seems. I'm talking purely srock value, yiur contending an expanding value. If we cannot align in a common goal of material wealth creation for stakeholders, then there is no point to creat a new benchmark our of thin air.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@swedish_analyst @oguzerkan Right...Just like he did with mataverse, where earnings werr good & drockpirce didn't move for 2 years. Yeah, we've been here & done that, you're not talking to someone new to stocks buddy, this is American fintwit.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@swedish_analyst @oguzerkan It isn't getting a return on their spending in the only thing that matters, stock price! Again, the sole responsibility of a company is to enrich the equity of it's owners. Your take is that of a communist, I'm sorry...but I am a capitalist.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

Not exactly, Zuck's direct spends means that it's goof for semis at the cost of $meta share holders. Thisnis my whole point. It's a form of indirect wealth transfer that you just don't understand. As a shareholders, it is Mark's responsibility to ensure wealth creation for us. He has failed over the last 2.years to keep.up with his competitors in this regard.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@spxtrade89 @Glitch_Trades He is a bases loaded home home-run hitter with 2 outs, 3 balls, 2 strikes...they call Glitch, but you will learn to call him Clutch!

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@SwissKnifeInv @smartrader19 Worst performing stock out of Mag7. $meta is only good for swing trades because of Zuckerberg's emotional Capex spends. This is metaverse 2.0 for him. Doesn't mean $meta can't reach 620 by 6%18 though. Probably not going to 1k by 2030 however. Who knows, it could.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@swedish_analyst @oguzerkan Perhaps you aren't even aware that in the United States, $meta has been the worst performer of any major U.S. company this year. This is a direct reflection to the transfer of wealth that Zuckerberg is doing as a result of his emotional reaction into relentless ai Capex spends.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

Not at all. Are you an actual $meta stockholder? If you were, then you would know what we are talking about. Zuckerberg's job is to bring value to us, not just profit in Ai, but actually value I to our holdings that translates into accumulated wealth. So far, over the last 2 years...that wealth was transfered to semis I want that wealth in my wallet, not just earnings reports

[JthanP @JthanJac]

But that hasn't translated to $meta shareholders, has it? I mean, you don't think $meta shareholders want to have moves like $amd or $mu? Basically, it's been inert for 2 years compared to the explosive growth of the QQQ. Call me crazy, but I believe that a CEO & company's profits should directly benefit shareholders, not their suppliers. If not, then what good are those earnings for? We may have another metaverse with this ai Capex debacle.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@CypherdC @Mr_Derivatives So far Zuck has added value: to the semi & other ai stocks. Yet, this has yet to be realized for actual shareholders of meta. I hope this doesn't turn into another metaverse & lost 2-3 years, as Zuckerberg has a tendency to be stubborn against the backdrop of failure.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@rbutcher2178 @DividendTalks No matter how good the numbers are to buy...Zuckerberg needs to do more to control the narrative or else this becomes another metaverse debacle. Zuckerberg often tends to burry his head in stubbornness, but he can't get away with it this time & expect meta to hold past 600.

[JthanP @JthanJac]

@hugeballer_ @Glitch_Trades 🤫