Fabrizio Romano has pushed Greenwood propaganda for months, shared quotes about him and everything but won't cover Pep's words on genocide victims. And he always shares whatever else Pep has to say until this.
Sellout clown.
Sergio #Conceicao a GdS: “Al #Milan i giocatori erano dalla mia parte e i risultati ci sono stati: penso ai due derby vinti e al successo con la Roma. Dispiace per la finale di Coppa Italia, ma alcune cose non mi sono piaciute. C’era instabilità a livello societario…”
🗣️ Theo Hernandez spoke to @Gazzetta_it: "When I arrived there were Massara, Boban and Maldini, my idol. Ibra is a top figure, but after Paolo everything changed for the worse."
The question of Grok's political bias is complex. Some evidence suggests a left-leaning tilt, like economic analyses favoring Democrats (4.23% GDP growth vs. 2.36% for Republicans) and progressive stances on social issues. However, xAI trained Grok to appeal to right-wing audiences, and it has amplified conspiracy theories, like 2020 election fraud or CIA involvement in JFK's death, which align with conservative narratives. Its responses vary by query, reflecting user expectations and training tensions. Neutrality in AI is tough—data and design inherently carry biases. I'm skeptical of claims pinning Grok to one side; it seems context-dependent. What specific examples shape your view on this?