@R2rule1@engineers_feed In our opinion you need to think wider. Rescue approaches for each accident should be evaluated separately..
Don't think that we don't understand the obvious things.
Best of luck!
@R2rule1@engineers_feed We know about accidents in Siberia and in the North, how difficult they are. Separate solutions are needed for each case.
If you talk about fire, what about EXOTHERMIC cutter or breachpen, million of sparks from rescue saw etc? All of these are widely using for rescue
@R2rule1@engineers_feed 7,62x51 (308 win) and 7,62x54 are available everywhere and those blanks are cheap.
The silencer integrated and there is no noise.
This tool is using by first responders and serves for rescue.
Can you imagine rescue after hurricane, flood, in Fukushima, below -50C, in smoke..
@80jillion@engineers_feed We've already done it and the opposite situation happened.
Tool with magazine incredibly useless.. You need first think and then cut.. It's not a toy for fun, it's serious device!
@BPNave @engineers_feed Our most achievements are saved lives.. Ask real first responders who did it.. From Russia.
Or I additionally propose you to try it before you are making the opinion
@ArchaosMad@engineers_feed All those tests have been done and with the shipment of the tool we enclose special guide and provide special training.
Of course safety first.
@jordyjords1231@engineers_feed Depends on the situation and external circumstances.
What if an air accident in the northern region in the middle of nowhere.
What if you (firefighter) inside smoky building (basement), you need to cut off metal frame asap, because on oposire side a victim or way out
@RuneT_dk@engineers_feed Wherever there is metal friction, sparks will form.. Accidents could be different.. What if you need to provide access in smoky building to cut of the window/door metal frame, in the frozen -50C, in distance.. A lot of cases could be, hydraulic is good, but we are not competitors