Justice for #mashinsky's victims. Serial liar ruined so many poeples'lives. Fight for accountability. Share all the Neggative News about Mascamsky you can
I asked Grok 3 who called out Celsius Network Fraud before the pause?
Though there are many (?) Grok found this from January 2022
“That is a technical qualification of a Ponzi scheme.”
https://t.co/ys3aONjAGq
@presel_ Judge Glenn doesn t agree with Grok. It was no ponzi and a legit innovative business that deserved a second chance to reorganize and.......
SCAM AGAINNNNNNNN😂😂
Hey @KrissyMeehan_
Enjoy your circle j*rk of Jamers, Araceli, Carol & the last brain damaged hold outs of 🐈 🍋
Figure you are just trying to relive your social circle 🫶
“At the high end, a dozen [S&P500] companies pay more than $400,000”
The board of directors at @IonicDigital are paying themselves $450k. So only 12 of the 500 largest, best run companies in the US pay their directors more.
Let that sink in.
https://t.co/mtYxTAC78B
Let's get it done, folks. The board needs to go and competent and transparent new leadership needs appointments. Don't wait for others to do the work. Sign up and force the meeting to get your voices heard and the board fired.
We added 111 shareholders this weekend supporting our push for change, accountability, transparency and liquidity at Ionic Digital - keep them coming! Almost half of these did not fill out the original form. Let's get to 50%!
Pledge your support here: https://t.co/Aq93D1EzCl
Is there really only one person publicly defending @IonicDigital right now?
And it's the guy who once compared leaving bad @USAstrongIO reviews to the suffering of Nazi concentration camps?
They (@IonicDigital ) are clearly a hostile board against their shareholders. Which is never a good sign. The sheer amount of disconnect between parties highlights there is very little mutual ground and the board has made it clear they see no reason or desire to make proper adjustments per shareholder wishes.
They've been given a clear and precise roadmap of proper communication and shareholder expectations since the company emerged from Ch.11. The fact they've ignored all requests for improvements in all aspects of this "public" company raises many red flags.
I'd also encourage you to include in the vote a compensation adjustment for current/future board members. Requiring at-least 50% of compensation to be in equity instead of cash payments. Also, bonuses and any other incentives should also be in equity. The all cash or option to receive cash for performance metrics which they themselves determine is and has created massive conflict of interests. They have zero incentive to push a listing in a timely manner, as they earn no additional revenue. While poor performance on the NASDAQ would result in their termination. So they have all the incentive to NOT list the company and drag this out indefinitely.