Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
Bro, let’s stop pretending.
Muslims make up about 25% of the entire world’s population — over 2 billion people across 50+ countries.
Japanese people? About 1.4% of the world. One single country.
Shinto exists only in Japan.
So when people say “Japan should prioritize minorities and be more accommodating to Islam,” who exactly are we talking about?
The global majority is coming to one of the world’s smallest ethnic and religious groups and demanding that Japan change its culture, food, and traditions for them.
That’s not “protecting minorities.” That’s the majority trying to colonize a tiny minority.
Japan has every right to protect its own people and culture first.
If Muslims want to live under Islamic rules, they already have dozens of countries where they can do that. They don’t need to come to Japan and turn it into another one.
Some LC-36 updates. Now that we’ve had access to the pad and integration facility we can share a bit of good news. The propellant farm, oxygen, liquid hydrogen and LNG tanks are all in good shape. This is good luck because these are very long lead items. The water tower is also good. The big support tower is damaged, but it can be repaired in place rather than torn down and replaced. The booster “Never Tell Me The Odds” and the three GS-2s that were onsite in the integration facility also look good.
I’ve seen some speculation that we might move directly to the 9x4 configuration, but we won’t do that. Rate manufacturing of 7x2 is going well, and we’re going to continue that at pace as planned and store the stages for use. In addition, we had already been working for some time on eliminating our transporter-erector in favor of an alternative vertical conop, and we’ll now go directly to that; so we don’t need a new transporter-erector.
We will fly again before the end of this year. Gradatim Ferociter.
@JustGreg223@CarlHigbie The tower that fell was a lightening tower and nothing more. IT NOT built the exact same way. It was far lighter structure not designed to carry an elevator or people. It was flimsy in comparison.
Anyone who claims the lack of joy about the 250th is a function of a rough economy was not alive in 1976.
The country rocked in its 200th celebration and the economy was a FREAKING MESS.
There is this Gen Z misconception that the '70s and early '80s were some sort of economic golden age of readily available, well-paying jobs, low cost housing and an all around sense of prosperity.
WRONG.
Google "Stagflation." Google "gas lines." Google "mortgage interest rates in the 1980s."
Our economy today is a golden age by comparison, without exaggeration.
Yet somehow in 1976 we could gleefully celebrate our nation's birthday without Democrats turning it into a Howard Zinn-inspired anti-history hatefest.
@josephepstein@leamaric They pull 6 molars before I got braces in 1978. They said I had a tiny mouth and needed to room to straighten my very crooked teeth.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
The unfortunate anomaly of New Glenn and the pad infrastructure raises the question:
Can Falcon Heavy launch Blue Moon MK1-101 Endurance (Moon Base 1)?
A 21.35-ton Blue Moon to TLI on Falcon Heavy Expendable is theoretically doable but would be one of the heaviest high-energy payloads Falcon Heavy has ever attempted. It sits right at the edge of what the vehicle can achieve.
The #1 valid concern is topping off Blue Moon’s LH2/LOX in LEO, which Falcon Heavy using RP-1 simply cannot do.
There is really only one option: a fully expendable Falcon Heavy (no recovery) with Blue Moon fully loaded to its max propellant of ~15 tons. Blue Moon’s wet mass is 21.35 metric tons, and a fully expendable Falcon Heavy can launch ~20-22 tons to TLI, leaving little or no margin.
#2 valid concern is boil-off of Blue Moon’s propellant (LH2/LOX). LH2 should boil off more.
Blue Moon MK1 needs roughly 5,500–7,000 kg (5.5–7 tons) of propellant for the lunar descent and landing phase. Adding 1,000-1,500 kg for boil-off during the 4-5 day transit and ~2,000 kg for trajectory corrections still leaves enough propellant to land the 3-ton cargo with reasonable safety margins.
I don’t think boil-off would be a major issue.
#3 concern is the Falcon fairing and Blue Moon’s dimensions. The legs would need to be modified to fold to fit in the fairing properly, but it is doable.
In conclusion, this is the best option. If @NASAMoonBase really wants that lander on the Moon by the end of 2026, @blueorigin and @SpaceX will have to team up for one of the most powerful collaboration missions in spaceflight history.
I say GO FOR LAUNCH 🚀 🇺🇸 🌕
Here's what bothers me about all the artists pulling out of The Great American State Fair. Martina McBride, Bret Michaels, Milli Vanilli (who knew they were still around) and others claim that they can't play this event because it's too divisive and has caused security concerns.
PLEASE, HELP ME UNDERSTAND. I can't see the people who want to attend a Freedom 250 event causing security threats. Are these threats instead coming from the people who are AGAINST this celebration?
And what part of Freedom 250 is divisive? Please, be specific. I love Martina McBride. What changed that made this event no longer "non-partisan?" I'd like to know because NONE of this should be about politics.
I remember the Bicentennial. Everyone got together, Republicans and Democrats, to celebrate the 200th birthday of our nation. I remember people HATED President Ford and Nixon at the time. But they still showed up to celebrate. They didn’t boycott due to the person in the Oval Office. The celebration was bigger than the president.
Freedom 250 should be exactly the same. No politics. No partisanship. If that's really what it's turning into, I'd like to know exactly how. Until then, it just looks like partisanship and fear of retaliation from their own side when performers drop out.
@detroitsux You are sick. How dare you pin your father’s behavior on all boomers. My grandparents handed down every car they ever owned to their kids and grandkids for free. They were the least selfish people you ever met.
@martinamcbride I lost all respect for you. This 4th of July was celebrating ALL 50 states and ALL of America. You must made it partisan when it was only about celebrating 250 years of America.