@AntiDisinfo86 You know how celestial objects drop by 1° from the zenith per 60 nautical miles distance from the GP? Yeah, that doesn't work on your model. In fact, it doesn't work on _any_ flat model. That's an isometry from the cel sphere to Earth's surface, and isometries preserve curvature.
@Marjori88206011 @SholaDogg I drove around Australia in 2022-2023, this is the path I took. And guess what? It's as big as the globe-based maps say. Also, I must have missed all the military occupying it.
@Gleem39694761@Mordwand42@AntiDisinfo86 The lines haven't yet converged at the edge of the "map", and I couldn't know what you imagine happens beyond the edge, because you haven't stated it until now.
As for 3 points... well, if you want to have 3 south poles, I rest my case. This is not what I was referring to.
@Gleem39694761@Mordwand42@AntiDisinfo86 But the fundamental group was supposed to be (Z,+). This is a contradiction. Thus, the assumption that lines of longitude converge on two points on a plane was false. QED. (6/6)
@Gleem39694761@Mordwand42@AntiDisinfo86 So, all loops in such a space are homotopic to points, which means the fundamental group of this space is trivial. (5/6)
@Gleem39694761@Mordwand42@AntiDisinfo86 "you have not even tested a single FE model in your life"
Just shows how little you know about me.
And this discussion here doesn't require testing. There's mathematical proof that what is being claimed is impossible.
@Gleem39694761@Mordwand42@AntiDisinfo86 I know it's impossible because I know how to prove it. I sketched the proof in another message. You can just admit you didn't understand it, you know.