✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨

“One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.” - Mark Twain

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@ArthurCDent @aryehazan @tracewoodgrains @ErikN_NJEdition He’s complaining about a psych screening that seems lame but hasn’t been used in 8 years. And you still had to take the atsa then too. It has a 95% pass rate and military don’t even have to take the test. So pretending like they just rank people based on a basic screener is 🙄

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@DeryaTR_ How would you avoid tolerance?

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@jsharpe2023 @ksjfdiewn332444 @lionel_trolling Hopefully not. Just I didn’t find anything in her writing to be assuring. I find the reasoning well just don’t bring it before the courts and if someone is concerned enough that’s enough for us. Seems like something that went through such a big process of amendment should not be

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@jsharpe2023 @ksjfdiewn332444 @lionel_trolling Right. She’s not actively saying she would overturn those. Just saying why she wouldn’t. But that is not the case anymore as Trump will bring those issues before the court.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@AstorAaron @RaginMode But then read her reasoning for why it wouldn’t work for her kind of originalism. That there shouldn’t be anyone with standing to bring it before the court and if there was then that would indicate it wasn’t a super precedent anymore. Starting on page 19

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@jsharpe2023 @ksjfdiewn332444 @lionel_trolling I would have assumed that as well. She’s the one who cited the 14th amendment as causing problems for originalists though, indicating they could be on the table as well. And that the solution was just not to bring cases before the court. You can read what she wrote.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@jsharpe2023 @ksjfdiewn332444 @lionel_trolling She’s saying she’s not arguing to without someone with standing coming in front of the court. And if someone comes in front of the court then overturning it should be considered bc it is no longer a super precedent.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@notistotny @lionel_trolling The citation she uses is that the south were under an illegal military occupation and only ratified it to stop an illegal occupation……it’s 😬

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@Rebecca21951651 @DavidBahry Just because one sensible thing is said doesn’t mean the whole argument is sensible. But retract proximal origin in your bio kinda gives the game away for what you consider sensible.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@Rebecca21951651 @DavidBahry Saying elderly people are more susceptible was not the controversial part. It was assume you’ve had it and vaccinating is more dangerous. Which some of vaccination strategy in limited supply is focused on high contact people who can quickly amplify spread.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@Rebecca21951651 @DavidBahry I did read it. He argued that the majority of people in India had natural immunity and that there were more harms than benefits to people with natural immunity. This is despite very low testing in India compared to other countries for people to know whether they’d been infected.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@SashaGusevPosts Yes I think too many people misunderstand and pushback on “correlation doesn’t mean causation” with “obviously causation is heavily suggested and more so the more n’s”. But forget that mechanism of causation and direction it goes can’t just be filled with whatever story they want

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@_colourmeamused She should have stayed and just let loose a bunch on this rfk jr nomination. No need to pretend these are good, respectable decisions.

[Marc Johnson @SolidEvidence]

The account looked legitimate. They are a paying account (I’ve never seen a bot that pays).
They’ve been on the platform for over 2 years.
They have 52 followers, some of whom I recognize, and they compulsively repost interesting science posts (including some of mine).
3/

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@lovingtaeonmain @SolidEvidence What’s the end game? Like hoping people give out info or just a scam link?

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@arijitchakrav @SolidEvidence @chaz_hong @arthur_courtin @OlzmannLab @Minnie644045 @BakerLabMS @CMichaelGibson @DrSaba @coxsarah789 @kevinoleary677 @sycd84 @kellyxugu @ForsbergLab @TurnewTqwbWbb Oh yeah that sounds like the weird phishing scammy texts. Wonder if it’s be the same sort of thing where eventually they send you a bad link to click. Except a more sophisticated version

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@SolidEvidence @ipattorneyliza Yeah I think the biggest tell here is no PhD student in a research field is going to have a 2nd job as a research scientist, especially in something so vague as “uncovering mysteries”.

[✨Algorithmically Unbiased✨ @SciencePartisan]

@arijitchakrav @SolidEvidence @chaz_hong @arthur_courtin @OlzmannLab @Minnie644045 @BakerLabMS @CMichaelGibson @DrSaba @coxsarah789 @kevinoleary677 @sycd84 @kellyxugu @ForsbergLab @TurnewTqwbWbb Did she have the same sort of vague ask about your research wrapping up?