seanjohnson

The world is my erster.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@Draft2Digital hey guys, I’ve emailed multiple times. Need an answer to a couple of very straightforward questions. Can you please get back to me. New customer. This is not a good look for you.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@TheMaineWonk Obama may have had some of the pigmentation, but calling him “African American” is a stretch. “Hope and Change”. Right. You’re not much of a thinker are you?

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@elonmusk But without the idea there is no execution. Ideas are not trivial.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@SaraForTexLege Fix the system before you demand we pay for it.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@IAmJakeHuffaker @ced_jayy Nailed it.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@dasukocho @NRNRNH0Gh2 @RadioGenoa No, they are demanding attention…stealing it, actually, and providing nothing worthwhile in return. Gyrating in what looks to be a sacred space, clearly unconcerned about the peace of others or the significance of the space. It’s obnoxious.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@dasukocho @NRNRNH0Gh2 @RadioGenoa Um, it’s incongruous, distorted, bizarre? It’s like you’re asking me to explain how red is red. One thing it absolutely is not, is charming.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@Dragao4Ever24 @RadioGenoa No. It’d still be grotesque.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@NRNRNH0Gh2 @RadioGenoa Fun and charming? It is grotesque.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@samponder Bleeding was a thing prescribed by doctors for centuries, whatever that’s worth.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@thingsbrandosay @Devlinside123 @AnimarchyYT Then they can fix it gradually if we’re going to stay with this archaic system: People born in 2020 have to work until whatever. They can’t change it in front of those who’ve already made plans.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@Investor_NICK_ Nor in Austin.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@Devlinside123 @AnimarchyYT Of course, but no one wants to be left standing when the music stops.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

They need to figure out something, but not moving it past 62, which is when I plan to retire. Lol. It needs a structural overhaul, but my bet is that it will all be rolled into some national UBI program. The whole system (much of which was built 80+ years ago) needs thoughtful and fair reconsideration.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

No, it’s definitely not a low IQ lack of understanding - it’s about principle. They can’t move the goalposts like that…it is incumbent on the government (that is supposed to serve us) to find a solution within the framework. 62 is the year we have all agreed upon. If they break the rules, we all need our money back…with interest.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@Mollyploofkins That’s contrived. It’s not true. It doesn’t even address what fascism is, which is the partnership (fasc) of business and government.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

You’d be surprised how little going from a low cost area makings $70k to a high cost area making $150k changes things. You’re marginally better off, but by no means wealthy. Plus, for the job, you need nicer clothes, car, etc. Sure, you could still live like a monk, but you won’t fit in. Anyway, my whole point was that the OP framed it as top ten percent and top ten percent isn’t that much. Maybe top 5% are wealthy in the way we consider wealth, but $180 is at best mid upper middle.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@trangineer @GunnelsWarren Not everywhere.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@transraven332 @SBS0311 I don’t want to get rid of it either! I just wanted to show that the bar in the plan was $180k. I thought top 10% would be much higher…but it’s essentially solid middle class in most places. Surely there’s a better way to fix it.

[seanjohnson @seanjohnson]

@John_HTown @1LikeCheese @GunnelsWarren That they are taxed more is certain. That they live in a place with a higher cost of living is likely.