@frogpitgaming@Willibab89 Good and bad are necessarily subjective, you might as well say there's nothing wrong with subjectively having a favorite color that isn't THE favorite color. Obviously "favorite" is always relative to a subject just like good & bad, "objectively bad" is an oxymoron.
@DK15779516@Rahll @sithdaddyvlogs @NemonaMC The vid above is clearly a parody so it's got that going for it, but I'm no lawyer so I don't know what to say about the fair use status of making the video from AI
@DK15779516@Rahll @sithdaddyvlogs @NemonaMC I think you can straight up clip a film if it's for stuff like critique, parody, news reporting. but selling a game using an actor without their permission doesn't fall into those categories. Fair use is a legal defense so any uncertainty in the rules would be decided by a judge
@Rahll @sithdaddyvlogs @NemonaMC Not defending this guy but you are allowed to monetize fair use content. Consider that all video game reviews operate under fair use and can monetize their videos. Again not defending the slop poster here, not sure his vids qualify as fair use but if they did he could monetize it
@AtelDsign@MagoryNET@ephtracy But he just had the AI paint over an existing image right? I don't think this has to do with training if I understand that thread correctly.
@AmazingThew iirc you typically make your TBN from the delta between your uv coordinates so if your uvs are flipped then your tangents are too, no special case for it. But there's also a number of ways to produce tangents so I'm not sure about this game in particular.
@TheReedfeller@djanck@thkaal @GadzooksB No no it's the private ownership of people and their work that makes it capitalist. Or ownership of machines and factories, or whatever other productive thing. Just having trade and objects with value doesn't make an economic system capitalist is all I'm trying to say.
@TheReedfeller@djanck@thkaal @GadzooksB No, money is not another word for capital. money is one kind of capital. People, machines, and factories are also capital, and capitalism is about who owns these productive resources. Ancient people bartering with coins under feudalism is not capitalism.
@ArchaicEquilib1 @YukiTheEgg @SkittlezJuice@M4dumy Yea, although it's probably not training data in this case. They likely gave the network a template image as a starting point, but yea the AI model is like 4gb trained on billions of images. it's impossible that this one specific image is perfectly encoded into it.
@HalogenStare @VibeHandler@JoshuaPotash When I worked at a consulting company I found out the client was paying $200k for my work while my boss paid me $70k. Depending on the industry you're working in your boss is taking even more from you.
@CryptoOccultist @WW3updated teenagers kill & die for bullshit politicians. Living trauma while you are sat at home trading crypto you miserable worm
@stolinski@SirKto@LeahLundqvist I agree it's just a mental model. So not trying to say Svelte is wrong for doing this - it may be a great idea to do reactivity on a primitive variable level, but since plain JS doesn't work this way you can see why someone would say it's magic.
@SirKto@stolinski@LeahLundqvist Your question was why should I expect side effects from a setter but not from an assignment, but you shouldn't expect side-effects from an assignment, so I hope it's clear why I gave you a rhetorical question
@SirKto@stolinski@LeahLundqvist I expect that it would rerender. it's a setCountAndRerender function of course, since we name it we omit the rerender part. Setters tend to have side-effects so it's obvious there's machinery beyond just setting the variable.