An alim says:
I knew free mixing was haraam, but when i saw our ulama doing it, it made me think that there must be some sort of leeway or permissibility in it when doing the work of da'wah. Surely our ulama would not knowingly commit sins.
Then I met other scholars who explained to me that haraam is haraam, regardless of the intentions and purpose.
Being someone who has studied islam, yet I was so easily decieved, then what about the average muslim? How will they know what is right and wrong?
For myself this was very disturbing. I always thought, regardless of peoples weaknesses and sins, that our own scholars would prioritise upholding the teachings of islam and that to them the haq mattered more then anything else. All this was very shocking and surpriseing, it was hurtful because these are the ulama other ulama look up to and hold in high esteem.
The most painful part is, that its very hard to explain to muslims that they are being decieved. They have destroyed islam. And its not only them. Our dar ul ulooms, institutes, and islamic organisations are all getting corrupted. Right and wrong no longer matters. Its all about money and ecceptance.
Dangerous times are coming, and we have no one reliable to turn to. Everywhere we turn we find corruption, greed, and fitnah.
Shame on our dar ulooms and all the hazrats who sit silent while all this fitna is spreading. Shame on our ulama who are knowingly spreading fitnah. May Allah punish them all in this world and the hereafter for their treachery against islam.
Ameen
Israel is bombing my hometown, Beit Hanoun, after having already completely destroyed it. There isn’t a single human being left there, nor a single house that hasn't been leveled to the ground. I don't know what they are bombing anymore. I don't know what they are afraid of? The rubble!
@Kashfulhaq_ One of the reasons I stopped listening to nasheeds years back, it's become entertainment, there's no substance to them, the singers went to normalise free mixing. Nasheeds are now just background noise.
New home ed bill will put restrictions on families, and over the top surveyance. We always knew this was the plan, as families found a way to produce a healthier lifestyle, without brainwashing and children getting broken bones at school. But... most Muslims in the UK are zzzzz.
“Raising awareness,” “speak up about it,” lobbying, protesting, petitioning, programmes, “expressing concern,” “displaying outrage,” “raising our voices,” “well said,” bayans, “history will remember,” have at this critical juncture all become slogans, antonyms, lies, or…⬇️
If you read the Tafsir, they all point to this verse referring to a specific group of Christians, whether from the entourage of an-Najashi, emissaries of his who traveled to Makkah and became Muslim, or a delegation that came from Najran that converted to Islam.
It's not just my deducation, look at what Imam Mar'ee al-Karmi said in his book about Quranic abrogation:
قَوْله {ولتجدن أقربهم مَوَدَّة للَّذين آمنُوا الَّذين قَالُوا إِنَّا نَصَارَى} هَذَا خَاص بالنجاشي ووفده الَّذين أَسْلمُوا لما قدمُوا على النَّبِي صلى الله عليه وسلم وهم اثْنَان وَثَلَاثُونَ أَو أَرْبَعُونَ أَو سَبْعُونَ أَو ثَمَانُون رجلا وَلَيْسَ المُرَاد كل النَّصَارَى لأَنهم فِي عداوتهم كاليهود
"His SWT statement: {Surely, you will find the closest to them in affection for those who believe are those who say: 'We are Christians'.} [5:82]"
"This is specific to an-Najashi and his delegation who converted to Islam when they visited the Prophet SAWS. They were 32, 40, 70, or 80 men [depending on the Hadith]. The intended meaning is not all Christians since they are like the Jews in their enmity [for Islam & Muslims]..."
Qila'ad ul-Marjan, p. 100
I don't know why people drag this verse out whenever they think some Christians are friendly or not as hateful as other Disbelievers...
Look at the date.
That's why it's not "Hijrah" to simply obtain temporary visas or even permanent residency in any of these modern nation-states that are majority-Muslim in population.
Their governments are unprincipled and non-Islamic.
They will use your stay there as a way of collecting visa revenues and as long as you're spending income there while not posing any kind of political issue, you can stay.
The moment you say something they don't like or the moment Kuffaar take an interest, they're looking to expel you, just for brownie points.
That could never be "Hijrah."
Its not about what we do but how we do it.
First example if we eat but do not follow the sunnah then we are not rewarded. But if we do it according to the sunnah then we are rewarded.
The action is the same but its the method which differs.
Similarly, if we give da'wah, but our methods are not according to islam, then we will not be rewarded, and many times we will sins instead.
For the past two years, I’ve been vocal about the fact that the charity sector is run by individuals no different from prosperity gospel preachers. It’s unsurprising that no one from the Dawah scene has joined me in fighting this good fight against these mercenaries.
These vultures and criminals are exploiting the noble pillar of Zakat to enrich themselves. Charities are even admitting to using Zakat as an insurance policy and even for electricity (yes, you heard me right). They’re employing Talmudic loopholes and technicalities to steal your Zakat money. I’m due to record a video backed by a fatwa demonstrating their deception and this won’t stop until we take action.
I slipped, and below is WRONG. May Allah reward @TalhaGulbargavi for correcting me. Utaybah son of Abu Lahab died a Kāfir.
His brothers, Utbah and Mu'attib radiyallahu anhuma stood firm alongside Nabi sallallahu alayhi wa sallam at Hunayn when others weakened.
Young children from the age of 14 know islam better then our ulama when it comes to lowing the gaze.
If you ask them what should we do when we see a women they say lower your gaze, yet our scholars have written a whole book justifying making eye contact.
Why is it that even though we have so many masajid and ulama, yet the truth will mostly be spoken by anonymous people online?
Why cant the imaam who gives the Friday khutba mention to us the dangers we face? Why cant our masajid warn us of scholars who are a fitnah?
If attending speaches by .@muftimenk and .@SulaimanMoola in their mixed events are a danger to our imaan, then why dont masajid openly and clearly warn against it?