This is how Buhari was too embarrassed to view the video that evidenced the grave human rights violations he levied in Southeast. But Southeast shall remember this till eternity.
If FBI can be begging the court to not release Tinubuโs case file.
Then the world should just apologise to
Pablo Escobar, Yahoo Boys in Nigeria and release HUSHPUPPY immediately!
Rare moment in Ethiopia when Ojukwu and Zik stuck together at a peace conference. Anthony Enahoro, who was later exiled by Sani Abacha represented Nigeria.
Let this be clear: The Nigerian government is yet to respond to the several processes filed by MAZI NNAMDI KANU at the Appeal Court & the one previously filed before the Supreme Court. And whilst virtually all the processes have long become ripe for hearing, the Courts are yet to act.
Dear World,
I will never stop reminding the world that if we want peace to return to Nigeria, we must be prepared to REARRANGE NIGERIA.
Christians are being killed, and each day we lament, condemn and mournโyet the violence continues.
Even those who claim to be helping to resolve the crisis, including @US_SrAdvisorAF Massad Boulos, continue to lament the situation.
The time for endless lamentation is over. The time for a political decision has come.
Nigeria must ENGAGE TO DISENGAGE.
As long as Nigeria refuses to confront and resolve the Biafran question, there will be no lasting peace.
We must have the courage to examine the structure of Nigeria, address the grievances that have remained unresolved for decades, and consider a genuine rearrangement of Nigeria as part of a political solution.
No peace without justice.
No justice without addressing the Biafran question.
No lasting solution without political courage.
~ Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga
Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
https://t.co/QTugVgkbPP
Re: Tinubu files, Nigerians need to understand the US doesn't work like Nigeria. With all our flaws, we do have transparency and the rule of law. Not to say it is perfect, but it's strong.
So no, nobody paid the FBI or CIA or the judge or Trump to block the release of the files. The legal reason they are stating is valid (not saying it's accurate, but it is plausible): Release of the files would endanger lives -- likely either informant(s) or undercover agents. That's the question on the table before the judge now.
And since that is the question, what is the answer? Whose life or lives are they afraid will be threatened if this information comes out? Seeing that we're 33 years later, there's zero chance it's an undercover operative. So it's a snitch. A rat.
And who is the one fighting the release? Tinubu himself. So it stands to reason that the way he got out of the heroin trafficking charges back in 1993 was not just forfeiting the $460k, but also ratting out others in the network.
This was a big operation, reaching into the South East Asian underworld -- where people in power then are still in power now.
Not long after Tinubu left the US, the US attacked those networks. Was it based on information Tinubu provided? If so, then yes, releasing the files may well put his life in danger.
Did he turn over names of prominent Nigerians too? People who may back him now politically, unwittingly? That could prove fatal for him, too.
This is my working theory: BAT is a RAT.
#EarthShaker
Imo: Nigerian authorities must account for hundreds of unidentified bodies - Amnesty International, 22nd August 2026
Amnesty International is deeply concerned by reports alleging that hundreds of unidentified bodies are being moved from mortuaries in Imo State, including Ngor Okpala General Hospital, to unknown destinations. Bodies have also reportedly been seen at Mbieri General Hospital. The authorities must urgently clarify the circumstances surrounding the bodies and their movement.
Horrifying videos obtained by Amnesty International shows stages of moving the dead bodies at night. Majority of the bodies are at skeletal level and in large numbers.
โImo State Government and relevant authorities must to immediately account for all the bodies, establish their identities and causes of death, and explain when, where and how they came to be in the mortuaries and where they are now being taken. All bodies, mortuary records, medical records and other relevant evidence must be preserved to prevent interference with any investigation,โ said Isa Sanusi Director Amnesty International Nigeria.
โAllegations that some of the deceased may have been victims of unlawful killings during security operations in Imo State must be promptly, independently and impartially investigated,โ said Isa Sanusi
The authorities must ensure that the bodies are properly identified and subjected to appropriate forensic examinations, including autopsies where necessary, and that families are promptly informed and given information about their relatives.
No body or evidence should be concealed, destroyed, disposed of or otherwise interfered with. Anyone suspected of criminal responsibility for unlawful killings or other human rights violations must be investigated and, where there is sufficient admissible evidence, prosecuted in fair proceedings.
โThe families of those who died or disappeared have a right to know what happened to their loved ones. The authorities must act urgently to establish the truth, preserve evidence and ensure justice and accountability.โ
OPEN LETTER TO SUSIE WILES
22 August 2026
Mr.Donald Trump
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
United States of America
RE: WE CALL FOR TRANSPARENCY ON THE TINUBU CASE AND FBI RECORDS PLUS EQUAL TREATMENT SIMILAR THE MADURO CASE
Dear HE @realDonaldTrump
I write to you as Chairman and Founder of Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates, a Pan-African policy, legal and international affairs organisation based in the United Kingdom.
I write as a Pan-African advocate and international affairs expert concerned with the principles of transparency, accountability, due process and the equal application of the law, particularly where matters concerning African political leadership intersect with the institutions of the United States government.
My concern is the continuing controversy surrounding the United States governmentโs handling of historical FBI and Department of Justice records relating to President @officialABAT Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria.
We am not writing as a Nigerian citizens. We are writing as a Pan-African advocate concerned about the integrity of institutions and the confidence of African peoples in the rule of law.
On 20 August 2026, the FBI reportedly asked the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for permission to make confidential submissions ex parte and in camera concerning its continuing withholding of records relating to Tinubu.
These records reportedly date from 1992 and 1993.That raises a fundamental question.Why are records more than three decades old still being subjected to such extraordinary secrecy?
I fully recognize that not every FBI record can automatically be released. Legitimate protections for confidential sources, personal privacy, investigative methods and national security must be respected.
But those protections must not become a mechanism for withholding an entire historical record indefinitely.The American public deserves transparency.The Nigerian people deserve transparency.And the wider African public deserves confidence that the same principles are being applied consistently.
THE QUESTION OF THE TINUBU RECORDS
The historical record concerning President Tinubu and the United States has been the subject of public litigation and extensive reporting.
The underlying FOIA litigation has concerned FBI and DEA records dating from the early 1990s and the question of whether those agencies could lawfully refuse even to confirm the existence of responsive records.
In April 2025, Judge Beryl Howell rejected the governmentโs continued Glomar position concerning the Tinubu records and ordered the relevant agencies to search for and process non-exempt records.
That judicial development is extremely important.The issue is no longer simply whether such records exist.The courts have already addressed that question.
The issue now is what records exist, what portions are legally exempt, and why the American government continues to resist disclosure of material that is more than thirty years old.THE $460,000 FORFEITURE
There is also the historical issue concerning approximately US$460,000 forfeited by Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the United States in 1993 in a civil proceeding connected with allegations concerning narcotics proceeds.
We want to be absolutely clear on an important legal point:A civil forfeiture is not the same as a criminal conviction, and President Tinubu was not convicted of narcotics trafficking arising from that matter.
But the existence of the forfeiture and the underlying investigation are legitimate matters of historical and public interest. Ms. Wiles, the credibility of the United States is ultimately not measured by how effectively it can keep records secret. It is measured by whether it can apply its laws fairly when the person concerned is powerful.
History is watching.
So are we.
Yours faithfully,
Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates
United Kingdom
@SusieWiles@SecRubio@MikeArnoldTruth
My colleague, Barr Maxwell Opara adds his voice to the growing calls on the Federal Governemnt to urgently review the cases of thousands of Igbos detained without trial for several years, including those held incommunicado at the notorious Wawa military cantonment in Niger State.
๐๐๐
It would have been RIP all over yesterday. I am speechless. Unfortunately we lost one of us #NFSS personnel. He took a bullet.
As i was struggling to find my way out, my legs could no longer carry me. I was completely paralyzed. A police officer serving at Abavo Divisional Headquarters had to carry me on his back like a baby just to get me through ๐๐
If Nigeria were a zoo in any other country in the world, the animals would have been rescued, the zoo closed, and the management would be facing criminal charges for cruelty to animals and sundry charges..๐ณ๐ฌ๐ค
Here's something for my new #Biafran followers. If you have access to documents exposing collusion between the Nigerian security state and jihadists, funding documentation, etc., please DM me privately.
I'm looking for hard evidence that Nigeria, like Pakistan, plays both sides of the fence with #jihadist, #terrorism.
THANK YOU PEOPLE โEDUCATION TO INTERNATIONAL JOURNALISTS
On behalf of the technical team in Helsinki Finland, I want to thank this group below for spreading the gospel of Biafra to global journalists and ordinary people in Finland.
โCases are not won by books alone. Political and legal strategy matter. The strategy I have used in Finland has helped expose weaknesses and put pressure on the arguments being advancedโ.
Now you can see why I stayed in Helsinki far away, but very efficient in my coordination with the lawyer.
This is not the time for a shouting competition. What we need now is prayer, patience, strategy and focus.
We pray for Simon Ekpa to be released.
I have done my best. ๐๐พ
โ Dr. David Nyekorach-Matsanga
PRESS RELEASE: 18 August 2026
By: OKWU-KANU FAMILY
FOURTEEN DAYS TO STOP HIS RELEASE. MONTHS OF DELAY WHEN HE SEEKS FREEDOM. WHY?
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Writes Chief Justice of Nigeria and President of the Court of Appeal Asking for His Cases to Be Listed Immediately
Federal Government Shows No Willingness to Join Issues in Either Court
United States Congress, Israeli Knesset and International Bar Association Will Be Formally Notified
The Okwu-Kanu Family wishes to inform Nigerians and the international community that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has now written separately to the Chief Justice of Nigeria and the President of the Court of Appeal requesting the immediate listing and hearing of his two pending cases.
The reason is simple.
The Federal Government has shown no sign of willingness to join issues in either proceeding, while Mazi Nnamdi Kanu remains in detention serving a life sentence.
He is not asking for special treatment.
He is asking the Nigerian judiciary to show the same urgency when his freedom is at stake that it showed when the Federal Government wanted to stop his release.
The benchmark was set by the judiciary itself in October 2022.
FOURTEEN DAYS TO STOP HIS RELEASE
On 13 October 2022, the Court of Appeal delivered its final judgment discharging Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and quashing the criminal counts against him.
It was an acquittal-equivalent discharge.
The Federal Government refused to release him.
By 28 October 2022โbarely two weeks laterโthe Federal Government had filed, listed, argued and obtained a civil stay of execution from a differently constituted panel of the same Court of Appeal, even though the criminal appeal had already been finally determined and the Court was functus officio.
The stay stopped Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from enjoying the liberty granted by his acquittal-equivalent discharge.
Fourteen days.
In fourteen days, the machinery of the Court of Appeal moved from an acquittal-equivalent discharge to a civil stay that kept Mazi Nnamdi Kanu in detention.
The criminal appeal had already been finally determined. The Court was functus officio. Yet a differently constituted panel was assembled and civil procedure was deployed to restrain liberty arising from a concluded criminal proceeding.
That is the constitutionally impermissible hybridisation of civil and criminal procedure at the heart of the 28 October 2022 order.
A civil stay is not a criminal charge.
A civil stay is not a remand warrant.
A civil stay does not revive quashed criminal counts.
And a civil procedural rule cannot be transformed into a criminal power to keep a discharged person in detention.
To our knowledge, never before in Nigeria has a civil procedural rule been deployed in this manner to deny liberty to a person following an acquittal-equivalent discharge. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu appears to be the first and only person subjected to it.
The common-law world should take notice of what occurred:
A finally determined criminal appeal.
A functus officio Court of Appeal.
A differently constituted panel.
Civil procedure imported into a concluded criminal case.
And the result was continued detention of the man the same Court of Appeal had discharged fourteen days earlier.
FOURTEEN DAYS THEN. MONTHS NOW.
Where is that same urgency today?
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu commenced proceedings before the Supreme Court on 7 November 2025, challenging the legality of the Supreme Court's remittal judgment of 15 December 2023.
The Federal Republic of Nigeria was served.
More than nine months have passed.
According to the records available to the family, the Government has filed no substantive response.
The case has not been listed for hearing.
There is also a separate appeal before the Court of Appeal challenging Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's 20 November 2025 conviction and life sentence.