The dangerous precedent that legally sets if Lindsay Clancy is found “Not guilty” for the M*rder of her three kids
Una go just dey hear reference “In the case of Lindsay Clancy VS United States 2026”
I was literally talking to someone today and he said "why would you assign your task to an AI, I don't trust it'll do it well, all those things are so unreliable"
Friends and brethren,
that's how I started a two hours lecture that we'll probably have to continue another time🫠
while all of AI twitter is arguing about Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra, 95% of people out in public don't know either one exists.
The gap is wild.
Explaining doesn't work. Showing them AI built games doesn't work.
Software developers are blown away because AI can do our job better and faster.
- when robots build an entire house in 24 hours, the construction worker will get it.
- when robots cook the food perfect every time, the chefs will understand.
- when robots run into a burning building and save a family, the firefighters will understand too.
people don't get it yet because they can't see what is coming as clearly as we can.
we have been impacted, and what we see has far exceeded our expectations.
Sam Altman: "in the next 6 months, we're close to a world where a descendant of ChatGPT can watch your screen, record every meeting and call, and have perfect context of your whole life."
he says we're only one model generation away from this being incredibly useful.
think about what that actually means. an assistant that never needs you to re-explain anything. it already knows the project, the client, the last conversation, the thing you said three weeks ago. you just ask, and it picks up mid-thought.
this is the shift from a chatbot you prompt to an assistant that already has the context.
if you want to watch the full interview, it's below.