Hinduism is still illogical, the only 3 religions worth considering logically imo would be judaism, islam and Christianity. Again u are assuming Jesus is only a representative of God when Jesus Himself did not teach that. You have to let Jesus speak for Himself, you are forcing your islamic presuppositions onto Jesus, when Jesus contradicts your theology.
You view Jesus life through the lens of the quran instead of the eye witness sources that directly quote Him, where He on various occasions claims to be the word of God Himself, where He boldly claims eternal Divinity. You have to look at the earliest documentarian, being the gospels and leave aside your Islamic bias
Why would u want me to site the source instead of going directly to the source yourself. You expect me to compress an hour long presentation into a tweet when you can listen to it for yourself? I've never had someone ask for evidence then get a direct link to said evidence then reject going thru it themselves. Just say you are lazy
@Orthodoxdoctor@InspiringPhilos@korrathetaymi Happily. Provide me yours.
https://t.co/zxEL1j2fPw
This is a scholarly presentation going through all the details of why the evidence is extremely strong that matthew wrote mattew, mark wrote mark, luke wrote luke and john wrote john.
Did u watch the video? It directly addresses that argument u made and refutes it. Just because the authors themselves may not have signed them, we can deduce who wrote them based on evidence that is available to us. We have very very strong evidence suggesting the authors actually were who the names are ascribed to. The Gospels give their individual accounts of the events from their pov, of course certain things are going to intersect and line up. This is exactly what any reasonable person would expect to see. For example, lets say there is a car crash and multiple witnesses. During the crash there was a scream from a lady, a dog that barked and the tires screeching. One witness records the crash and recalls a lady screaming and a tire screech noise, then another eye witness records the crash and a tire screech sound with a dog barking. Both are recording the same event with an intersecting detail (the car crash and tires screeching) but each records something that the other may not have (the lady screaming and dog barking), but still ACTUALLY happened during the event. This is in a nutshell what the gospels do.
I love when braindead atheists engage in a conversation with me then say some of the stupidest shit ive ever seen then block me before hearing a response, real bright
I can understand that line of logic based on the op's pic, but the spiderman fallacy os a childish argument regardless of whatever angle u want to look at the conversation. I believe there are genuinely good arguments for God's existence, ones actually worth contending with unlike the spider man fallacy. I much prefer the word 'evidence' rather than 'proof' anyways. I do happen to believe the contents of the Bible contain great evidence suggesting God's existence is at the very very least worth serious exploration and study.
@NollieBinDozin@God_Questioner Im not saying that theists dont use fallacies too, but without a doubt the popular atheist fallacy circulating lately seems to be the spider man fallacy, which many genuinely think is a check mate argument