every creator vetting guide is written for creators. here's the buyer's version:
1. ask for the last five posts they made in your niche, not their best five. the best five are a highlight reel anyone can assemble in a year. the last five tell you what lands on a normal week, which is what you're actually renting.
2. read their comment sections, but not for the reason everyone else does. most people read comments for demand signal, what the audience is asking to buy. i'm reading them for audience quality: are people asking this creator real questions, arguing with her, tagging friends. that audience will sit through a 40 second pitch. if the whole section is fire emojis, i treat the reach as rented.
3. confirm usage rights in writing before the first shoot, not after a clip performs. the moment a clip takes off and the creator sees the numbers, perpetual usage stops being part of the original deal. leverage flips overnight, and the cheap fix is a sentence in the brief before anyone films.
4. ask how they'd rewrite your hook. a creator who pushes back has watched her own retention graphs and knows which opening lines lose people in the first three seconds. that's the whole skill. the ones who say the brief looks great will read your copy out loud exactly as written, and you can hear it in the take.
all four questions test the same thing: whether this person pays attention to their own numbers. i have never had a creator answer them well and then send back a bad set of clips.
@lucaspatiri_ did the same joke actually hold up everywhere or did some countries need a different joke entirely? mexico and argentina barely laugh at the same stuff
@arielmichaeli wait family tree maker gets nearly the same downloads as ancestry and makes like 5% of the revenue?? that's the records paywall doing all the work
@romanbuildsaas 40 competitor sites is mostly 40 versions of everyone's best-case pitch. their 1-star reviews and reddit complaints would tell you way more about where the gap actually is
@rohanrkumar all of them is a stretch lol. opens were cooked the day apple shipped mail privacy, agents just finish it off. revenue per send doesnt care who skimmed it
@danielhangan_ sure, different brief and different edit. but plenty of paid winners started as organic posts that got whitelisted or sparked, so organic is kinda where you find out what's worth the budget
@romanbuildsaas sure, a first yes helps some. but a free pdf costs them nothing and a demo is 30 min with a salesperson. the pdf-to-booked rate is the number i'd actually want to see
@arielmichaeli revenue barely noticed tho, 180k in march vs 154k in oct on like a third of the installs. and the bounce looks like canada/aus, us went from 90% to 61%
@jakecastilloooo kinda backwards for sub apps imo. if month one churn is ugly you're just paying CAC to refill a leaky bucket, and a coupon on the cancel screen won't patch that
@dashboardlim people treat wait like the safe option but if it's stuck mid budget change nobody approving just means the old spend keeps burning all weekend