a crooked tooth

A troll trying to find the dish that ran away with the spoon.

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Odogwu_of_sales @sama

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Odogwu_of_sales @sama 🤦🏻

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Only_Knower @AdarshMi18 To delete kar na bhadwe

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Only_Knower There's still time to delete this

[timo @timo_rf]

they named it that because after 4 prompts all your tokens Argon

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@HarleyInHD @heyim_shree He needs to add another revenue stream because they're making a shit ton of losses. A new device wouldn't that problem if it uses more of their lllms at the end of the day, but can you imagine the amount of refined data they can get (& sell) from an always listening device?

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@thevirdas Preach.

[Vir Das @thevirdas]

The scariest thing about AI is how emotionless anyone who works in it is while making statements about existential risk.

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@lhagoodjames @jenzhuscott Have you ever actually tried running these models on commodity hardware. Or the overhead cost of orchestrating the multiple sharded models over the internet. Ain't viable bro. You could do it at deepmind maybe, but there's a world outside of it too.

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@leehagaman1 @jenzhuscott It's not about disk space my bro, it's about compute - cpu, gpu, RAM. And yes you can unplug that shit, deny it the compute and the program would crash.

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

Women who are actually leading face this kind of cheapness from your party.

Care to condemn and fire those responsible? As a woman yourself, what’s your take Smriti ji?

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@0xCodez larp

[Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders]

Elon Musk says Jacob Coxon’s warning about the existential threat of AI is a “setup.”

Really?

In 2014, Musk said, “With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon.”

In 2018, Musk said, “Mark my words, AI is far more dangerous than nukes. Far. So why do we have no regulatory oversight? This is insane.”

In 2025, Musk said, earth faces a 10-20% chance of “killer robots annihilating humanity.”

Elon, what’s changed? Does it have anything to do with the fact that you have invested many billions of dollars in AI and plan to build ten million robots a year?

[Sir Meemsalot @Meme0rable]

Effective Altruism in the wild

[Vinnie @VinnieKhurana]

Elon Musk acting like he actually has a reputation to save.

[Cuckturd @CattardSlim]

Is that JD Vance?

[Justine Moore @venturetwins]

OpenAI: “We’ve solved math”

Anthropic: “Our AI is so powerful it’s going to kill you”

Google: “Introducing Gemini 3.9 Flash! It’s 30% faster and 15% worse than the last Gemini”

[Mehdi (e/λ) @BetterCallMedhi]

go fuck yourself @sama

claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman

technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness

to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease

this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!

real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@ns123abc Reason why scientists should not expose their in-progress work to these models, use a local model if you can. Because these companies will definitely steal your work and won't even credit you.

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Wm_Harlow @topclanker @amelia_tweetz With software it's a bit different, it's the 'Sass'ification of software that's bad. If I paid for it and it runs entirely on my own machine I don't want to pay recurring fees for it (looking at you @Adobe)

[a crooked tooth @sextynein]

@Wm_Harlow @topclanker @amelia_tweetz Streaming is a bit different because it's effectively a replacement for cable, which from where I'm from, was always a subscription model. CDs were a different thing.
Not to mention with streaming, it's on demand vs for cable you had to watch at during set timings