Understand New India through two cases. American mercenary gets mercy and bail; IIT Professor stares at jail for doing his duty. VanDyke Vs Prof Doolla
आईआईटी मुंबई के प्रोफेसर के साथ जो हो रहा है वह बेचैन करनेवाली है । यह शिक्षण संथाओं के बुनियाद को हिला कर रख देगा । बचपन में हम स्कूल में पढ़ते थे । हरि जी उस स्कूल में चपरासी थे । लेकिन हिंदी के विद्वान थे । जाति से कहार थे और हम सभी पैर छूते थे । दूसरे श��क्षक यादव थे जियोग्राफी पढ़ाते थे । अच्छी खासी कुटाई करते थे यदि हम टास्क न पूरा करें तो । बुढ़वा मास्टर साहब कुर्मी थे । न जाने कितनी छड़ियाँ तोड़ी लेकिन दादा जी और माता को पता लगता था तब कहती थी मास्टर साहब ने अच्छा किया । आज भी उन्हें याद कर आँखें गीली हो जाती हैं । आज हम कहाँ आकर खड़े हैं ।
शिक्षक मारना तो दूर डाँट नहीं सकता । नक़ल पकड़ने पर सस्पेंड हो जाय तो कौन शिक्षक आगे आयेगा । हम शिक्षण ��ंस्थानों में जातीय सं��र्ष का बीजारोपण बहुत पहले ही कर चुके हैं । ईश्वर ही मालिक है ।
1. SC/ST act was passed on 11 Sep, 1989 (by Rajiv Gandhi govt).
2. It was notified on 29 Jan, 1990 (by VP Singh govt, supported by BJP).
3. Major changes introduced in SC/ST act during 2014-2016 (BJP tenure):
-Enhanced relief amounts (up to 8.5 lakhs)
-Relaxed payment structure
-Faster payment
-Increased offenses from 22 to 47
-A stricter presumption of guilt
-Mandatory & exclusive special courts
4. In 2018, Supreme Court introduced 3 safeguards saying act was misused for blackmail (in Kashinath Mahajan case). But BJP passed an amendment to nullify the Supreme Court judgement & added section 18A, which added following provisions:
-No preliminary inquiry
-No bail
-No prior approval for arrest (for public servants)
5. Multiple high courts, police reports, NCRB reports show the act being misused, esp for monetary compensation.
But instead of stopping the misuse, what BJP govt is doing?
-Planning 40% increase in compensation amount (upto 12 lakhs)
So, Inference?
- If BJP govt had not nullified the Supreme Court judgement, @ajeetbharti would have been safe.
But because of section 18A, added by BJP, his bail was denied.
-If BJP had not increased the compensation amounts or made the payment easier/faster without any scrutiny, the maximum misuse could have been prevented.
-If BJP had not added provision of denial of bail/no preliminary enquiry (18A again), the act wouldn't have become draconian and used for blackmailing people
-Despite rampant misuse, and knowing that money is the primary factor, instead of taking actions to prevent misuse, if you increase the monetary compensation, it only means you want to promote misuse.
So yes, it is aptly called "Modi Act".
Nahi to kisko credit de iska?
सर्व धर्म समभाव
सर्व पंथ समभाव
हमारे पूर्वज एक हैं
गंगा जमुनी तहजीब
हमारा डीएनए एक है
गुरुकुल मदरसा एक समान
सनातन था सनातन है सनातन रहेगा
वेद पुराण बाइबिल कुरान एक समान
कुछ बात है कि हस्ती मिटती नहीं हमारी
मजहब नहीं सिखाता आपस में बैर रखना
कोई और जुमला है तो अवश्य लिखिए
CAN EVERYONE JOIN ME IN DEMANDING THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF CHINMOY KRISHNA DAS?
#FreeChinmoyKrishnaDas
A son could not fulfil his dying mother’s last wish—to see him one final time.
Yesterday, while she was still alive, he was denied permission to visit her. Today, she is gone, and he is completely heartbroken.
No son should be forced to endure this. No dying mother should be denied her final wish.
He has already suffered enough. Please raise your voice and demand:
RELEASE CHINMOY KRISHNA DAS NOW.
Do not let another tragedy happen inside a Bangladeshi jail.
#FreeChinmoyKrishnaDas
स्वतंत्र भारद्वाज ने गलत किया तो 70 दिन बाद भी SC/ST लगा दिया जाएगा और वो जेल जाएगा लेकिन उसको पीटनेवाले वीडियो में दिख रहे हैं पर उनपर कोई कार्रवाई नहीं होगी।
अजीत भारती को गाली देनेवाले का बाल भी बांका नहीं होगा लेकिन अजीत के जवाब पर SC/ST एक्ट भी लगेगा और उसको एंटीसिपेटरी बेल ���ी नहीं मिलेगी।
ये सिर्फ दो उदाहरण नहीं हैं.. यही आज की डेट में हमारे समाज की सच्चाई है।
सवाल बस इतना है कि जब किसी के गलत पर होनेवाला कानूनी एक्शन उसकी जाति देखकर होता है तो वो प्रक्रिया बटेंगे तो कटेंगे की कैटेगरी में आती है या नहीं?
जब देश की व्यवस्था ही हमें एक नहीं मान रही तो काहे का एक हैं तो सेफ हैं फिर? आज कोई और है.. कल को हममें से कोई होगा। बस अपनी बारी का इंतजार कीजिए।
मुझे ना आपका लाइक चाहिए ना आपका फॉलो चाहिए बस रीट्वीट कर दीजिए ताकि अधिक से अधिक लोगों तक आवाज जाए और ज्यादा से ज्यादा कल लोग पार्लियामेंट थाने आए 🙏🏼
याद रहे कि पुलिस उनकी ही सुनती है जिसके साथ भीड़ ज्यादा होती है जैसा कि आज आपने देखा
#swantra@_kattar__hindu @Abhiofficial005
Mere 6 saal ke career ki ye sabse shocking stories me se ek hai.
Punjab poore India ko khana deta hai, lekin in hari-bhari fields ke peeche ek disturbing reality chhupi hai — pesticides, polluted water aur serious health concerns.
Mai ground par gayi aur sach jaanne ki koshish ki.
Watch: https://t.co/p5A1bwlzgZ
To @BJP4India@AmitMalviya@JPNadda@blsanthosh
Elections are coming.
Listen carefully.
Not every Hindu will vote for you because you are Hindu's.
-@_kattar__hindu (Swatantra Bhardwaj) is the same hindu guy who saved hundreds of sisters and daughters from Love Jihad.
The one who does gau raksha day and night. The one who gave his whole life for Dharma and Hindutva.
Now when he’s in trouble… you are missing? Gonna leave him alone like Nupur Sharma and tiger Raja Singh?
Remember .. all Hindu votes are for Hindutva, not for your party. If you abandon our Hindu warriors, Hindus will abandon you in upcoming elections.
We Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🔥
UP रोडवेज 🔥
भाई साहब फ्री बस सेवा में ऐसे बस दौड़ेगी?
खाली बस लेकर उलटी साइड से बस भगा कर सवारी बिठाने जाता रोडवेज Pilot
@UPSRTCHQ दीजिये अवार्ड भैया को नाक ऊंची की है आखिर आपकी...
@myogiadityanath
We live in an India where:
Birthday of Prophet Muhammad is a national holiday.
Birthday of Jesus Christ is a national Holiday.
Birthday of Gandhi is a national holiday.
But Birthday of Shri Rāma is NOT a national holiday.
There is no national Hindu holiday in Pakistan. No national Hindu holiday in Gulf where large number of Hindus reside.
But in India, both the Eids, Muharram and Prophet's birthday are mandatory national holidays whereas Janmashtami and Rakhi are optional.
Why is the onus upon Hindus to sacrifice even our happiness and festivity to uphold fake Indian secularism?
मेरे ऊपर SC/ST एक्ट में FIR पर कुछ बातें सवर्ण समाज से
कोई मेरी माँ या बहन पर सीधे बलात्कारी मानसिकता के साथ यह कहे कि उसका विवाह मैं चंद्रशेखर के साथ करा द��ँ, और मैं चुप रह जाऊँ तो आप बताइए कि मैं कैसा पुत्र या भाई हूँ?
इतने पर भी चंद्रशेखर को ले कर मैंने कोई जातिसूचक शब्द नहीं बोला, जो उक्त वीडियो में है। जब स्टेज से ब्राह्मणों की बेटियों को खींचने की बातें होती हैं और किसी SC नेता का चेला सोच-समझ कर उकसाने के लिए ऐसी बात करेगा, तो मैं चुप कैसे रहूँगा?
आज व्यक्ति अपने मौलिक अधिकारों को समझे या न समझे, वह यह अवश्य जानता है कि SC/ST एक्ट क्या है। तो मैं जब ���ोलता हूँ तो मुझे अपनी सीमाएँ (चाहे वह कितनी ही अनुचित क्यों न हों) पता हैं कि क्या बोलना है, क्या नहीं।
मैं जानता हूँ कि दिल्ली पुलिस के नॉर्थ अवेन्यू स्टेशन में आजाद समाज पार्टी वालों ने कितना दवाब दे कर रात के बारह ��जे यह FIR लिखवाया है जो कोर्ट में दो मिनट नहीं टिकेगा। एक भी धारा ऐसी नहीं है जो होल्ड करेगी।
मैं सैनिक स्कूल का छात्र हूँ और इतनी रैगिंग झेल चुका हूँ कि मेरा मनोबल तोड़ने के लिए दिल्ली पुलिस को कस्टडी में मेरी हत्या करनी पड़ेगी, दो-चार डंडों से मेरा मनोबल नहीं टूटने वाला। और यदि मैं जीवित बच गया तो इसी स्थिति में जंतर मंतर जाऊँगा और अपने समाज से कहूँगा कि बताओ, तुम्हारी बहन और माँ को ले कर कोई ऐ��ी टिप्पणी करे तो क्या करोगे?
यदि ऐसा कमेंट फिर मेरे वीडियो पर आया तो मैं पुनः उसी तरीके से उत्तर दूँगा जो मैंने दिया। कानून जब तक है, संशोधन नहीं होता, मैं उसका सम्मान करूँगा और दिल्ली पुलिस के साथ पूर्ण सहयोग करूँगा। 92% ऐसे केस केवल प्रताड़ित करने के लिए होते हैं।
अंत में, सवर्ण समाज से यह ��ूछना चाहता हूँ कि क्या इस तरह की टिप्पणी पर मुझे सह लेनी चाहिए थी क्योंकि किसी पार्टी के लोग नाराज हो जाएँगे? क्या ब्राह्मणों की माँ और बहनें इन रेप मैंटिलिटी से संचालित गुंडों के शाब्दिक बलात्कार के लिए जन्म लेती हैं?
Meet Behenji Mayawati, India's most privileged victim.
She demands more reservations. She calls anyone questioning them anti-national. She claims the system has failed Dalits. What she never mentions is her own story.
Her grandfather, Mangal Sen, was a soldier in the British Indian Army. This was an elite job for Indians of the early 20th century. When most Indians did not have guaranteed food on the table, less than 1% were fortunate enough to hold such a position. It came with a fixed government salary, a pension, and land. At a time when most Indians were doing unpaid manual labor with zero rights, Mangal Sen had financial stability that most Indians, upper caste or Dalit, could only dream of. That salary, pension and land put the Das family on a completely different trajectory from 99% of Dalits of that era.
His son Prabhu Das became a government employee in the postal department through SC reservation. Stable income. Government benefits. His children received free education through reservation schemes. Three generations of state support, stacked one on top of the other.
His daughter Mayawati used reservation to advance through education and politics. She became UP CM four times. She accumulated personal assets worth over Rs 111 crore(official). By any measure, she is the single greatest hijacker of the reservation system in Indian history.
And yet she stands at podiums telling you the system has failed and she wants more.
She justifies reservation by screaming that economical policies for the poor are ineffective. What she doesn't tell you is that such policies are ineffective precisely because of her and her ilk. She herself gulped down budget of 1000s of crores for economic policies, yet 30% of her own Dalit community is below the poverty line.
Now she fights tooth and nail against economic reservations for poor GC families. People who never had a soldier grandfather with land and a pension. Never had a government job father. Never had reservation benefits stacked across three generations. Families genuinely starting from zero. She wants them to remain downtrodden and suffer while she and her ilk continue to capture everything meant for downtrodden.
Her argument is that caste discrimination justifies continued reservation. Then answer this one question. After three generations of your own family benefiting, grandfather with army salary, pension and land, father in government through reservation, daughter as four-time Chief Minister with Rs 111 crore in assets, at what point exactly does your family step aside and let the actual poor and downtrodden in?
Reservations were designed as a temporary corrective measure. They were never meant to be a permanent inheritance system for the same families across generations. Mayawati is not the face of reservation's failure. She is the face of exactly who captured it. In fact, reservations passing down the line for generations is exactly what discriminatory Caste System is all about.
The Dalit still doing manual labor in a UP village today holds the same SC certificate as Mayawati. He just doesn't have her grandfather's land, pension and army salary to stand on. He simply doesn't have resources to compete with likes of her for that seat.
She wants her family and similar elite families to continue enjoying reservations while poor GCs and Dalits are starving. Worse, she wants to deny these previlges to poor GCs who never had such luck in their entire generation.
Manusriti : Yatra Naari Pujyante Vasante Tatra Devta ("Where women are honored, the deities (divinity) are pleased and reside there; but where they are not honored, all noble actions yield no reward.")
But this is Anti Women.
Lets look at Bible and Quran for that matter.
BIBLE:
1. Timothy 2:11–12: "Let a woman learn in silence with full submission. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.
2. Corinthians 14:34–35: "Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says."
3 Ephesians 5:22: "Wives, be subject to your husbands as you are to the Lord," a sentiment echoed in Colossians 3:18.
4 Corinthians 11:8–9 “Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”
5 Genesis 3:16: As part of the consequence after eating the forbidden fruit, God tells the woman, "Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you."
6. Leviticus 15:19–30: Details ritual uncleanness associated with natural biological functions like menstruation, treating the state as contaminating to surrounding objects and people.
QURAN
1. Men are caretaker of women. Men have been provisioned by Allah over women. A righteous woman would be one who is devoutly obedient and, when alone, protective of what Allah has entrusted them with. And if you sense ill-conduct from your women, advise them ˹first˺, if they persist, do not share their beds, but if they still persist, then discipline them.
what that means: Men are superior, women need to take orders from them and if they don't then men has the right to decipline women.
2. Surah Al-Baqarah verse 223: Your wives are like farmland for you. Approach them as you please.
Meaning : Your wives are you farmland and you can do whatever you feel like doing with her. This is happening in a society where we talk about Marital rape,
3. Surah Al Nisa verse 24: All married women (muhsanat) are forbidden to you except those women whom your right hands have come to possess (as a result of war).
Meaning: Win girls from war and use them as you please.
4. Surah Al-Baqarah verse 282: And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not (at hand) then a man and two women, of such as ye approve as witnesses, so that if the one erreth (through forgetfulness) the other will remember.
Meaning : Weightage of a Man's testimony is twice than the weightage of a woman.
How many Christians read and believe in Bible? 100%
How many Muslims read or Believe in Quran? 100%
How many Hindus read or believe in Manusmriti? 1%
But what is problematic? MANUSMRITI ofcourse.
When did hypocrisy become “science”?
Look who came to “civilise” us!
When they wash and drink water that has touched a centuries-old decomposed relic, it is called scientific and “faith.” But when Hindus practise and follow the profound, symbolic and spiritual traditions of the Rishis, we are branded primitive, barbaric or superstitious.
Why is one tradition called “advanced” while the other is dismissed as backward?
For centuries, the intellectual achievements and subtle sciences of Bharat have been judged through an Abrahamic lens that presumed the right to define what is “civilised.”
How long will this intellectual double standard—and the condescension towards India—continue?
It is time to question the lens, not blindly accept the label.