@ValerieAnne1970 Wrong -
"In cohort ... offered vaccination routinely at age 12-13 years, age adjusted rates of cervical cancer & CIN3 in 12 months of follow-up were 83.9% and 94.3% LOWER than women never offered HPV vaccination."
@Desert_Hustle "Since 1974, vaccination has averted 154 million deaths, including 146 million among children < 5 years of whom 101 million were infants < 1 year. For every death averted, 66 years of full health gained on average, translating to 10·2 billion years of full health gained"
@NicHulscher So was your retracted ivermectin study incompetence, fraud or just an advertisement to sell ivermectin for your Wellness company? See Retraction Watch comments.
@drdrew@naomirwolf@dr_ericberg More nonsense from Wellness Co grifter. So was your retracted ivermecrin cancer study fraudulent or just incompetence? See Retraction Watch review:
@vaccine81097956 "cerebrovascular risks were LOWER in vaccinated compared to unvax (HR: 0.66) specifically cerebral infarction, occlusion & stenosis of precerebral arteries & other cerebrovasc dz...2-dose vaccination was a/w further REDUCED RISK cerebrovascular diseases compared to unvaccinated"
@vaccine81097956 1/2
Vaccinated 60% LOWER stroke risk here -
“The adjusted risk was significantly LOWER in fully vaccinated patients for both AMI (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94) and ischemic stroke (aHR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63).”
@P_McCulloughMD@DeionSanders@KirkHerbstreit@JalenHurts@McCulloughFund Nonsense from someone griting useless drugs -
"45.7 million adults in England... the incidence of common venous thrombotic events, (mainly pulmonary embolism & lower limb deep venous thrombosis) was LOWER after vaccination."
@GOP_is_Gutless Nonsense -
"45.7 million adults in England... the incidence of common venous thrombotic events, (mainly pulmonary embolism & lower limb deep venous thrombosis) was LOWER after vaccination."
@K4Yeshua@WilliamShatner Nonsense -
For every drug studied with effects at test tube / cell culture level, < 1 in 5,000 shown to be useful and safe in humans.
No RCTs in humans out there - so its irresponsible and potentially harmful to promote this unproven drug over proven cancer treatments.