@jarredsumner@NathanFlurry my dream for tsc7 was "runtime innovation", not "rewriting in golang"🥲🤷-- love the innovation & hopefully this stirs competition from v8/hermes/etc. thank you @jarredsumner !
@naman34 Ngl, you should just clone our Truss/tachyons abbreviations, they're better & shorter than TWs. 🙊😁 See https://t.co/lH9NzmQk3p for examples. Being semi-facetious/semi-serious. :-) Ty!
@naman34 Fwiw the css.display.flex, css.padding._16px API is okay-ish; I get inline is a huge step for stylex philosophically (given emphasis on clarity), but imo it is too verbose. For inline to work, you need really brevity imo, otherwise the JSX gets sprawly.
@naman34 Oh wow! I'll follow that PR--it would be amazing if it accepted a literal { color: blue }, so I could pass our Css.df.p2.color(color).$ dsl into it, but understood static analysis concerns.
@naman34 Nice! That was my hope as well 😅, something like "scan for https://t.co/bQif9L1QEM.$" => rewrite to top-level stylex.create => replace with apply but keep spreads/conditionals -- would be really amazing! i love stylex's "just javascript pojos" philosophy🎉
@bunjavascript if folks interested in official datadog support for bun could upvote https://t.co/t1in3TOAnj, the ddtrace team is watching that to gauge community/customer interest; for us this is our last blocker to bun in production😅
@dhh have you tried https://t.co/4NucHsvWPD? Imo really great, scales to "more than a handful of windows" much better than the built-in master/dwindle layouts; without it I would have tried migrating my #omarchy setup over to Niri/another scrolling WM by now
@petereliaskraft@petereliaskraft can I use the same database transaction to atomically commit my entities & the DBOS workflow change? The simplification of "save business data & queue downstream work" being an atomic operation is a huge win for database-as-a-queue pattern imo.
Joist has had a "dry run" mode, great for building "what if" or "oracle" features, that wasn't documented until now: https://t.co/ti6geln4Ty #typescript#orm 🎉
@petereliaskraft Ofc its not perfect, but @Joist_Orm solves N+1s. Other issues from the paper Joist also solves (uncached reads & inefficient updates) are imo well-suited for ORMs b/c it's very hard to organize business logic as adhoc, hand-coded SQL that doesn't suffer the same problems.😅
@jmeistrich Amazing idea! I'm porting our @Joist_Orm docs over to Starlight solely to copy/paste your snippet into our setup and get our own llms.txt :-) ty!