Sharpfont

Senior design + AI-assisted development. Websites, MVPs and internal tools. Your team, on subscription.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

We work directly in code, with shared components, documented decisions and working previews for review. Experiments can live on separate branches.

For 1,300 screens, I’d want a map of flows and states, clear ownership and a maintained component library. AI still needs that structure.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@ryanwashere Agreed. Access to the tools won’t protect anyone’s pricing. We’re betting on knowing what to make, keeping it coherent and taking responsibility for what ships. The bundle makes buying simpler, but we’ll still have to earn the renewal.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@chrislevan The fix is boring: put the price on the site.

Ours has no marble busts and says €3,500 for a landing page.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@thetorch_bearer Tactile on a screen mostly comes from three things: type with texture, colour that feels like paper, and motion with some weight to it.

We'd enjoy this one. Sharpfont, identity and web since 2010: https://t.co/994QVMmulo

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@dezisally Happy to help. Is it a new site or a redesign, and roughly how many pages?

We're Sharpfont, a studio that designs and builds. A site of up to 5 pages is €3,500, fixed, in 10 working days.

https://t.co/994QVMlWvQ

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@jimntale Sharpfont, design + build studio since 2010. We design the site and deliver it in code, at fixed prices listed on our site.

What kind of site is it: a business site, a shop, or a landing page for a product?

https://t.co/994QVMmulo

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

If a small studio is an option instead of one hire: Sharpfont, product, web and brand since 2010.

One track of senior design is €3,900 a month. One request in progress at a time, an update every 2–3 working days, pause before any renewal. Ship, learn, iterate is how it runs.

Mobile work: https://t.co/dEFwt3wXZ2

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@JamesonCamp Same shape in our design studio: several agents running, one person deciding.

What surprised us is where the hours went. Not into prompting. Into review: reading what came back and cutting half of it.

How much of your 6–7 hours is review?

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

We moved our own site off WordPress this month.

What ships now: about 235 KB of HTML, CSS and JS, compressed. No CMS, no plugins, nothing to patch on a Friday night.

Same content, a fraction of the weight.

What does your homepage weigh?

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

EU-based, Romania. We're a small studio rather than one freelancer, but this is the work we do: an identity carried through product UI, website and print.

Two examples attached: Zitamine (identity, packaging, site, product screens) and Transylvania Harmony (identity + website).

https://t.co/15rUuESbOK

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@theroborourke Did exactly this last night. Three emails to clients from 2015 to 2023, each with one specific thing about their business.

First reply landed before morning. Not a project yet, but the door is open again.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@ssaaammiirr Sharpfont, design + build studio since 2010.

SaaS landing page: €3,500, live in 10 working days. Identity plus the full site: from €9,000, 3–4 weeks, scope in writing before you pay. You keep the code.

Work: https://t.co/994QVMmulo

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@MaxHirsch13 True for the first draft. We build with agents every day.

The part that still takes a designer is deciding what to cut, and noticing when five good-looking screens don't add up to one product.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@yonajune Sharpfont here: brand + marketing sites, designed and built in code. Studio since 2010.

Fixed, published prices: a landing page is €3,500 in 10 working days, bigger sites are scoped in writing first. No intro call needed.

Work: https://t.co/994QVMlWvQ

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@FaZeNikan Real products we designed: Fanable (collectibles marketplace with drops, mobile + web) and EPIC (DeFi dashboard, staking, farming). Screens attached.

Design + build studio since 2010. We deliver the front end in working code.

https://t.co/994QVMlWvQ

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@CreativeDima @grok The real split in 2027 isn't Framer vs prompts. It's renting your page vs owning the code.

Prompts made owning it cheap. Someone with taste still has to review what ships.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

How a request moves through our studio:

You write the brief.
Specialist AI agents do the research, build and QA.
A senior designer reviews every change.
You get a working preview, not a mock-up.

The agents give us speed. The review is why you can ship it.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@iamleannmuller Same pattern on the design and build side. The agents are cheap; the shared context is the hard part. Ours work from the client's brand rules and past decisions, and a senior designer signs off every change. Without that, five agents give you five opinions.

[Sharpfont @sharpfont]

@coldemailchris The part that gets skipped: agents do the volume, but someone senior still has to decide what ships. We run design and build that way. Specialist agents for research, build and QA, a senior designer reviewing every change. The review step is where the value sits.