๐ค THANK YOU BRIGHTON FC
๐ค THANK YOU SEAGULLS
๐ค THANK YOU HURZELER
๐ค THANK YOU GROB
๐ค THANK YOU KOSTOULAS
๐ค THANK YOU ANDRES
๐ค THANK YOU FOOTBALL GODS
WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ๐ฅณ
Right before an international break is the worst time for your team to lose. Sky and SuperSport will almost finish you with the highlights for 2 whole weeks. Youโll hate football for that period and constantly avoid anything Premier League highlights. Arsenal, abeg o! ๐๐๐
Can this people listen to themselves??
"No definitive proof"
What's all the 1 billion cameras in the stadium for?
Just close down this sport right now
I can bet that within the next 10 games, the same thing will happen against Chelsea and the penalty will be given
Fuck #PGMOL
๐จ๐ตEx-PGMOL chief reveals why Chelsea were not awarded a penalty
According to former PGMOL chief and FIFA referee Keith Hackett, the decision not to give Chelsea a penalty was correct because there was not enough evidence that the ball actually struck Ajayiโs hand.
Referee Farai Hallam dismissed the claims, with VAR deciding not to intervene.
โIt is evident that the penalty kick was not awarded because it is not definitive that the ball came into contact with the hand,โ Hackett told Football Insider.
โSo correct decision not to award a penalty kick. Clearly, had contact been made, then the extended arm away from the defender's body would be a signal for the referee and VAR to award a penalty kick.
โNo contact with the hand/arm therefore there is no offence - no penalty kick.โ
Confirmed. Man City goal WAS a mistake. Pro Ref spokesperson said: โFollowing the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haalandโs awarded goal.
โThe on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland โ that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
โIn the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
โContact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.โ