Shegz

👨🏾‍💻 💭

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Opus 5 is just vibes and ai noise.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

😂

[Dami’ Adenuga @DAMIADENUGA]

This is the end.

[Iconuzor @icons_closet]

Giving up on Nigeria is giving up on yourself. Nigeria is not theirs to destroy and ours to abandon. It is OURS.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Cook

[senz 🌁 @senzcity]

notice how we have (i)message in the US but they have (We)Chat in China?

[Simon Ritter @speakjava]

I'm rapidly discovering that the only way to use artificial intelligence effectively is if you have real intelligence...

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Manchester United 👀

[Tosin Olugbenga @TosinOlugbenga]

Don’t give AI the whole project at once to build.

A good workflow is:

1. Product requirements
→ What are we actually building?

2. System architecture
→ What are the major components and how do they interact?

3. Domain model
→ What are the entities, relationships and business rules?

4. API/contracts
→ What does each service expose and consume?

5. Design system
→ How should the product look and behave?

6. Project conventions
→ How is code organised and written?

7. Implementation plan
→ Break the system into independently implementable units.

8. AI implementation
→ Give AI one bounded unit with the relevant context.

9. Tests
→ Verify the implementation against the contract.

10. Review/refactor
→ Make sure the implementation actually conforms to the architecture.

The key distinction is:

AI should answer “How do we implement this?” far more often than “What should our architecture be?”

You can absolutely use AI for architecture too, but you should make the final architectural decisions yourself.

AI is very good at generating alternatives, identifying trade-offs and spotting gaps; it becomes dangerous when its first generated solution silently becomes the architecture of your product.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Never be shy to ask; your breakthrough might just be dependent on you simply asking.

[Dario Amodei @DarioAmodei]

2/2 Second, on the messaging around AI.  I do not agree that my messaging has been disproportionately negative.  In fact it has been about equally balanced between risks and benefits: I’ve written one major essay about each, and even in interviews where I discuss the risks, I make sure to frequently mention the incredible benefits as well as proposing possible solutions to the risks (short clips from my interviews that end up on social media tend to be disproportionately negative, as that gets clicks).  In fact, I wrote Machines of Loving Grace because I didn’t feel the AI industry was painting an inspiring enough picture of how the technology could radically transform the world for the better.  The bulk of the essay is devoted to refuting skepticism of AI’s potential in health and biology, and showing why I think it will actually be possible to cure most human disease in ~5-10 years, as crazy as it may sound to ordinary people and frankly to biologists as well (I used to be one!).  And, if you read my most recent essay (Policy on the AI Exponential), I discuss concrete proposals for how to streamline the FDA process to make sure the deluge of AI-accelerated drugs isn’t slowed down by the regulatory process.  I feel the urgency here: I lost my father to Hepatitis C only a few years before the development of direct-acting antivirals (sofosbuvir), which cure 95% of patients and probably would have cured him.

I do agree that the public has a negative view of AI (and that this is a big problem), but I don’t think it is primarily caused by me or any other AI leader warning about AI’s risks.  I think it is fundamentally a crisis of trust.  I think that ordinary people don’t trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over.  The causes of this go back decades and AI is just the latest iteration of it.  I don’t think that a glitzy marketing campaign with a positive spin (which some have advocated that Anthropic do) is the way to win back that trust — at this point, saying that AI will cure cancer is more a cliche than it is inspiring, and most people think it is deceptive.  The thing that will work is *actually curing cancer*.  I think by far the most accurate criticism of AI companies including Anthropic is that we haven’t yet delivered on our big promises to benefit the world.  That is totally on us, and I think it’s the criticism you should be making, instead of all this stuff about messaging and marketing.

We are however doing our best to fix this: Anthropic is ramping up its efforts very quickly in biology and medicine, and we hope to have incredible results in the coming years and some early glimmers in the coming months.  When we’ve actually accomplished something real, the whole world will hear about it, as loudly as possible, you have my word on that.  But until then I don’t want to make empty promises, and in the meantime I feel compelled to speak honestly about the very real risks of AI and how to address them.  Honesty is the right thing on the merits, and in terms of public credibility and trust it is no worse than, and may in fact be better than, an approach that ignores or distracts from risks which people instinctively understand are real.

[Peter Agboola @baba_Omoloro]

No way this website exist!!!

https://t.co/xGIj0WwxOc

[ClaudeDevs @ClaudeDevs]

New in Claude Code: your sessions can now message each other.

Instead of having to re-explain yourself in another session, you can now tell Claude to do it. It sends a summary (not your history or files), and the other session picks it up mid-task.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

I am of the opinion that people should use AI in their area of expertise. Not rely on it to be the expert.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Digitization is not ai adoption

[Inspiration FM 92.3 @IFM923]

Osun State Governor alleges account freeze before election, describes move as political interference | Paper View

#news #politics #YourNo1FamilyRadio

@azuosumili @smartex007 @EmmaUji20

[conor brennan-burke @contextconor]

whoever successfully rebranded ‘bots’ as ‘agents’ is a god-tier marketer

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

@markessien I think people got used to Fable 5. And now both opus 4.8 and 5 look like jokers.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Punch the numbers and put them into perspective.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Slick

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Crypto bros meltdown all over TL

The institutional investment everyone clamored for ruined crypto.

[Shegz @shegz4u2c]

Good read ..