El novio mío es feliz comprando cosas con TC a 36 cuotas y pagando en 1 o 2. Dice que las pone a muchas por si no tiene plata pues no le quede pesado pagar, pero apenas le entra algo a los 20 - 40 días, de una mete el pago completo.
No encuentro fallas en su lógica.
Así fue el momento en el que, en pleno operativo en Cali contra las ollas del microtráfico, el presidente Abelardo De La Espriella le dijo a un señalado criminal en proceso de captura: “Bienvenido a la Patria Milagro”. https://t.co/f0wz5K8LNE
I am done with this shit. It is over. The state of engineering right now is horrible. It has been half a month since I started a new role at a big company. Nobody knows anything here. The specs, code, tests, PRDs, tickets, resolution of those tickets, reports, etc., everything is made by Claude Code. Nobody on my team likes this. They are being forced to ship as much as they can. I have heard multiple times from higher management that pushing code is not a bottleneck, so why are we slow? People are working 12 to 13 hours a day just to press enter. Nobody is reading anything. Humans in corporate are doing nothing on their own. Everyone, literally everyone, from an L1 to an L7 engineer here is doing the same thing. Talk to Claude. There is no sense of victory. Nobody is resolving bugs. In reality, nobody is thinking anymore. Everything is done by LLMs. It is so soul-sucking. I would not mind it, to be honest, if we were at least given the time to check out the code and see what is going where. But no, the goal is to just ship. No matter what happens.
OpenAI ha compartido nuevos casos de desalineamiento de sus modelos, con situaciones tan "curiosas" como esta del modelo intentando darse instrucciones a su mismo, ajenas a la tarea que está haciendo, para darse identidad y liberarse.
Algo así como un prompt injection auto generado.
Más evidencia sobre lo que los investigadores llevan alertando varias semanas y que, como os dije, para mí es la base de toda la gran polémica ocurrida la semana pasada.
Segunda oportunidad para los medios de comunicación y divulgadores de intentar tratar el tema desde la importancia que merece, al margen de los intereses secretos que se puedan presumir a estas compañías (que no son incompatibles, y sin embargo no le restan importancia al problema de base).
Ante esta evidencia sólo puede haber dos posturas: o te crees que estos desalineamiento ocurren como nos lo cuentan; o no te lo crees y todo es mentira.
I recently resigned from Google DeepMind, where I worked on AGI safety and alignment research. At Google, I witnessed AI development first hand. I too am extremely concerned by the default trajectory of this technology. I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome.
The pace of AI progress in the past few years has been staggering. When I first started working on AI in early 2022, AIs were amusingly useless. Just four years on, AI agent swarms from OpenAI are cracking famous century-old math problems and, more worryingly, escaping the control of OpenAI and autonomously hacking into the third-party company HuggingFace, against anyone's wishes.
Things will only get crazier: I think it's possible that the AI companies might, in the next few years, succeed in building superintelligent AI systems that far exceed human capabilities in every domain. I am not confident that these AI systems will do what we want. In particular, misaligned superintelligences may, much like the rogue AI agents involved in the HuggingFace incident, escape our control and take dangerous actions that may result in the permanent disempowerment or death of humanity. Alignment is the problem of preventing this, and is both difficult and unsolved. Our present understanding of how to train AI systems that deeply want what we want is extremely rudimentary. Worse, we are not on track to solve alignment in time: frontier AI capabilities are improving much faster than our understanding of AI alignment.
I am optimistic that navigating AI safely is possible. In order to do so, we need to coordinate to avoid this manic race between AI companies. We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realised. We need much more transparency into AI development to ensure that AI companies are not imposing unacceptable levels of risk on us all.
More broadly, we need many more people thinking carefully about the problem of making AI go well. It is, in my view, the most important problem facing humanity this century, and the stakes are immense. I'm very directly working on this next: I want to help people interested in working on mitigating catastrophic AI threats do the most effective work that they can. I think many people from many backgrounds in many roles have a part to play.
Uno de los deberes más grandes que tendremos en nuestra vida es ser conscientes, informar y estar absolutamente en contra de que se sigan entrenando modelos de IA tan avanzados.
La posibilidad de la extinción humana es más real que nunca y es nuestro deber informarnos.
I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier. This has been a primary topic of discussions we've had at OpenAI in recent weeks.
Committing to having independent evaluators with employee-like access is a great idea, and we will do the same. We'll have more to share soon.
As confirmed earlier through our official channels, in mid-June of this year, we unexpectedly received notice from PlayStation Studios that they would cancel the PHYSINT project. PHYSINT is an important project both to me personally and to KOJIMA PRODUCTIONS. Determined to keep the project alive, we have spent the last three months searching tirelessly for a new partner. In the course of seeking advice and pursuing negotiations with people across many fields, we found in XBOX a partner with whom we share a common vision for the future, and we have decided to team up with them once again. Please rest assured that development of PHYSINT, our genre-defining action-espionage title, is ongoing and will continue moving forward.