Heeey X builders, I want to share an exciting AI-Arbitrator product that @shunhewang built and shared with me.
https://t.co/8aJcCeCwAE
Imagine someone owes you $5,000 and won't pay. And court costs more than that, so most people give up.
This site lets an AI arbitrator decide at a cost of 5% ($250), and the award is legally binding...! So... we don't need human judge anymore?!
First time on camera. Please be kindπ»
"An attorney shall not delegate the practice of law to generative AI."
Wow, what a clear, well-drafted statute. I'm sure there won't be any confusion or litigation over what it means, or any chilling effect on new technology in the legal field.
Glad we work in a profession that never writes rules that happen to protect itself.
TRACKED CHANGES: California just became the first state to pass a law governing how lawyers use AI.
Gov. Newsom signed SB 574, barring lawyers from handing legal practice to AI or entering confidential information into AI tools without privacy protections, Bloomberg reports.
@YevhenNL It's true that a lot of traditional liability frameworks will still apply to agentic without too much of a stretch. Interesting to see where it goes
Two AI agents close a deal in under a second. No human reads a word. Is it a contract? Who pays when an agent screws up? Can your agent sign you up for arbitration? Under US law: yes, almost always you, and yes. https://t.co/HmmnGAMRL0
@LeoOliemans91 Yup, lots of people doing interesting work in the evidence protocol space and making sure everything is logged properly for later review
@JesterInABarrel This is why I left biglaw, felt like meat proxy in the near future was inevitable even if I were to ultimately break out of it eventually
everyone is obsessed with training models but the real opportunity might be in training humans
imagine taking young humans, exposing them to a carefully selected corpus for 12β20 years, using expert supervision + continuous evals, then deploying them into the economy
feels like a massive category. who is building this?
Imagine: in the future we could have intellectual gyms filled with books. Any member of the public could enter and use some credential like a physical card to use a book for mental training. Who is building this?
Humans have already had to adapt these problems:
- nutritional abundance (food is constantly available)
- physical labor as a strict necessity for life (go hunt, build, etc)
We have adapted:
- follow diet (imposed nutritional scarcity)
- workout / exercise (imposed physical labor)
Humans will eventually adapt to intellectual abundance β> go hit the books just like you hit the gym
@sebkrier Bit long. Consider "It's easy to output lots of text. We should value writing that is short, clear, and useful, not long writing that just looks thorough."