18.000 Menschen gehen für Freiheit und Demokratie auf die Straße – klar gegen das Mullah-Regime im Iran.
Friedlich, respektvoll, ohne Gewalt oder verfassungsfeindliche Parolen.
Dafür mit Solidarität, Wärme und Rückhalt für die mutigen Kämpfer für Freiheit im Iran.
Ein deutlicher Kontrast zu vielen „Pro-Palästina-Demos“. Das spricht für sich.
Microservices is the software industry’s most successful confidence scam. It convinces small teams that they are “thinking big” while systematically destroying their ability to move at all. It flatters ambition by weaponizing insecurity: if you’re not running a constellation of services, are you even a real company? Never mind that this architecture was invented to cope with organizational dysfunction at planetary scale. Now it’s being prescribed to teams that still share a Slack channel and a lunch table.
Small teams run on shared context. That is their superpower. Everyone can reason end-to-end. Everyone can change anything. Microservices vaporize that advantage on contact. They replace shared understanding with distributed ignorance. No one owns the whole anymore. Everyone owns a shard. The system becomes something that merely happens to the team, rather than something the team actively understands. This isn’t sophistication. It’s abdication.
Then comes the operational farce. Each service demands its own pipeline, secrets, alerts, metrics, dashboards, permissions, backups, and rituals of appeasement. You don’t “deploy” anymore—you synchronize a fleet. One bug now requires a multi-service autopsy. A feature release becomes a coordination exercise across artificial borders you invented for no reason. You didn’t simplify your system. You shattered it and called the debris “architecture.”
Microservices also lock incompetence in amber. You are forced to define APIs before you understand your own business. Guesses become contracts. Bad ideas become permanent dependencies. Every early mistake metastasizes through the network. In a monolith, wrong thinking is corrected with a refactor. In microservices, wrong thinking becomes infrastructure. You don’t just regret it—you host it, version it, and monitor it.
The claim that monoliths don’t scale is one of the dumbest lies in modern engineering folklore. What doesn’t scale is chaos. What doesn’t scale is process cosplay. What doesn’t scale is pretending you’re Netflix while shipping a glorified CRUD app. Monoliths scale just fine when teams have discipline, tests, and restraint. But restraint isn’t fashionable, and boring doesn’t make conference talks.
Microservices for small teams is not a technical mistake—it is a philosophical failure. It announces, loudly, that the team does not trust itself to understand its own system. It replaces accountability with protocol and momentum with middleware. You don’t get “future proofing.” You get permanent drag. And by the time you finally earn the scale that might justify this circus, your speed, your clarity, and your product instincts will already be gone.
۱- اگه هلندین، اتحادیهی کارگری FNV (بزرگترین اتحادیه کارگری در هلند با بیش از یک میلیون عضو) رسما حمایت خودش را از HSMهایی که توی هلند به ۱۰ ساله شدن شهروندی و نبود ترنزیشن پریود اعتراض دارن اعلام کرده 🇳🇱
اگه عضو FNV بشید، خیلی میتونه تاثیر خوبی بذاره.
یه گروه تلگرام هست /
ازین سبک آدم ها سعی کنید فاصله بگیرید، آدمی که به این راحتی به نتیجه گیری کلی میرسه، فردا ممکنه بیاد بگه ژاپنی ها از ایرانیا باهوش ترن، و ماهم دنبال باهوش ترین ها
The drive to be best isolates more than it builds.
A man chasing perfection often sacrifices connection and peace, losing sight of why he started. Hard work without balance becomes a cage, not a crown.
Ambition without rest burns out the soul.
Strive fiercely, but protect what grounds you.
@bardia_heydari@urgauovmi قبول دارم ازین نمیشه نتیجه گرفت، این یکی ولی تقریبا همین عدد ۲۰ درصد رو میده به عنوان میانگین، روی جامعه ۱۰۰ هزار نفره و تحقیق گسترده تری هم هست
https://t.co/1MqLGJbYu2