What I find amusing about humans, whether in crypto, markets, or elsewhere, is how they react when someone teaches them a useful concept.
At first, they elevate that person as a beacon of truth and treat the idea as absolute, rather than as a theory, framework or metric that works in some conditions but not all. Then, when the idea doesn’t play out perfectly, they use that same concept as a weapon against them.
The irony is, most never truly understood the framework. They only understood the part that confirmed what they wanted to believe.
NHS England has granted external staff from companies including Palantir, $PLTR, “unlimited access” to identifiable patient data while working on a part of its flagship data platform, per FT
Remember the guys who shilled you a bullish Q4 for crypto, then made you sell the bottom and buy metals/stocks in Q1 2026.
They also convinced you it was a bear market for 2026
Bear/Bull tug of war on timeline it seems.
Similar to war, fund both sides and create strategic tension, similarly seen in the left v right wing political discourse.
No one wants to be proven wrong, instead of aimlessly trying to defend your bias, your time and resources are better well spent in being in favourable outcomes/situations despite what side the tide turns.
I'm still favouring bull atm, if I'm wrong so be it. At least I get to consistently accumulate hard assets at "discounted rates". If I'm right, then my portfolio makes new ATH's, along with my ego lol.