Why $XRP & $HBAR they don’t have nothing announced on their pages?
Where is the proof of all of this?
Why you guys don’t share the proof also you just do posts with no fundaments that everybody can believe all of this is true?🤔 This looks like very unprofessional levels of a credible company to work, but a big level of a big scam!Please be more transparent on your posts!
So my honest view:
It looks like a real, tradable but very speculative narrative coin. Not an obvious straight-up rug from what I can see right now, but absolutely not something to trust blindly.
⸻
4. How I’d personally treat this kind of project
This is not financial advice, but how to think about it:
•If you do anything at all, treat it like a high-risk meme / narrative play, same level as degen Solana meta coins.
•Size accordingly: only what you’re 100% prepared to lose to zero.
•Don’t base decisions on TikTok/Instagram hype about quantum computing or “saving XRP”.
⸻
5. Quick checklist for you before putting 1€ in
If you want, I can help you walk through these one by one:
1.Smart-contract & chain
•Double-check the exact Solana contract (2BAKj…dXQa) on solscan and that you’re not buying a copy.
2.Holders & distribution
•See how concentrated the supply is (top 10 wallets). If one or two wallets hold a ridiculous % and are not team/vested, big risk.
3.Liquidity quality
•How much real liquidity is in the main pools (USDC/SOL)? Is it locked or controlled by the team?
https://t.co/71IfvIWor7 & team
•Is there a clear team, LinkedIn, and serious documentation beyond the marketing slogans about ANU/quantum randomness?
5.Independent security view
•Any real audit, or code review, or open-source validation of the “quantum randomness” integration?
If you want, next step I can do is:
•Go point-by-point through your screenshot (the exact claims it makes: returns, timelines, “guarantees”, etc.)
•Mark each line as ✅ plausible / ⚠️ marketing exaggeration / 🚨 red-flag.
Just send me that image again if you want me to dissect it line by line.
Yes, I saw it now – the screenshot about QuantumCore + XRPL. Let me tell you what I’ve found and what it really looks like 👇
⸻
1. What QuantumCore actually is
From what I can see, QuantumCore (ticker $QBS) is:
•A real token on Solana, listed on aggregators like CoinGecko, Bybit price pages, FXEmpire, etc. 
•Market cap around $5–6M, ~1B tokens in circulation, trading mainly on Solana DEXes like Meteora/Orca. 
•Narrative: “true quantum randomness anchored to blockchain” using an ANU (Australian National University) quantum random number generator, pushing hashes to Solana. 
So: it’s not a fake / non-existent token – it exists, trades, and has real liquidity.
⸻
2. What about the XRPL integration you saw?
There are a lot of TikTok/Instagram/X posts and reels saying things like:
“QuantumCore has officially completed its integration with the XRPL… massive step forward for XRP… quantum resistance…” 
Important points:
•These claims come mostly from influencers and marketing content, not from:
•The official XRPL docs or Ripple
•Well-known XRPL devs
•The official XRPL site has a whole section about scam tokens and warns people to be very careful with new “narrative” coins on XRPL. 
So I’d treat the “XRPL integration revolutionizing XRP” angle as heavy marketing, not proof of some deep official partnership.
⸻
3. Red flags & risk factors I’m seeing
I can’t label it 100% “scam” or 100% “safe”, but there are several warning signs you should take seriously:
1.Get-rich-quick style marketing
There are reels and posts like “How to turn $1,000 into $5,000,000 EASY” tied to QuantumCore. That kind of promise is a classic degen / hype red flag. 
2.Very new, narrative-driven token
•Fully diluted ~ $5–6M, launched recently, 100% of supply circulating. 
•These kinds of tokens live or die on hype & narratives (“quantum threat”, “XRPL integration”, “XRP to the moon”), not fundamentals.
3.Strange domain pattern around “quantumcore”
I can see several “.xyz” casino/slot/gambling websites using quantumcore-style domains (https://t.co/DrwTajYBob, https://t.co/xonusGLWH9, https://t.co/V9DEx0zdNM, etc.). 
•That doesn’t prove they’re linked, but it shows the name is being used in multiple aggressive/gambling contexts, which is not a great look.
https://t.co/tQ3YkZ5y6d big, verifiable partners
•I don’t see official announcements from Ripple/XRPL Foundation, top exchanges, or serious security firms.
•Most info is from smaller sites, DEX trackers and marketing pages, which is typical of early/high-risk tokens.
5.XRPL ecosystem is already full of scammy tokens
Even respected XRPL devs regularly warn about fake tokens using “XRP / Xumm / Xaman / Quantum / QFS / etc.” branding to piggyback on the community. 
How do you feel about Elon Musk?
“If you put that man in a position of power his true character will be revealed.”
“He could actually help people with that money but he don’t give a shit about you.”
“His character will be revealed and it will be seen that he is a rat bastard.”