Reminds me of Peter Naur's classic 1985 essay "Programming as Theory Building" which argues that a program is not its source code. A program is a shared mental construct (he uses the word theory) that lives in the minds of the people who work on it.
If you lose the people, you lose the program. The code is merely a written representation of the program, and it's lossy, so you can't reconstruct a program from its code.
If you think of total software debt as technical debt + cognitive debt, then previously, we mostly had technical debt. Now with AI we have both.
Previously, when you built something, you accumulated technical debt but relatively little cognitive debt because you had to understand what you were building in order to build it.
In other words: the theory came for free as a byproduct of the work.
AI breaks that coupling. Now you can produce code without building the theory.
So you're now able to accumulate both kinds of debt simultaneously - technical debt in the code and cognitive debt in yourself. And cognitive debt is arguably worse because you can fool yourself into believing it doesn't exist.
Technical debt tends to show up in semi-obvious ways that we understand well as an industry.
Cognitive debt is more insidious - it means you're unable to even reason about the program (because you possess no theory of it) - which is what Naur describes as the "death" of a program.
Had an absolute blast sitting down with Steve Huynh from A Life Engineered and talk about engineering, management, promotions, quality and AI:
https://t.co/oVlhJeKsoP
We took some time away from everything else to build something new.
A cross-platform real-time engine and toolset, written from the ground up over the past year.
@EccentricEngine#erik
The comments on software patents made me chuckle.
After selling both Id Software and Oculus, my continued employment contracts included “will not participate in software patents” clauses, and yet I got asked to reconsider in both cases. It wasn’t a lot of pressure, so I don’t hold it against them; it is just “part of the game” that executives consider themselves to be playing.
My views on the negative societal externalities of software patents have only hardened over the years. It rewards parasitism.
My three-geojson repo now supports internal polygon vertices via constrained delaunay triangulation so extruded shapes can be projected onto an ellipsoid surface with generated smooth normals! 🌎
More below👇
1/3
#threejs#gis#javascript#webgl
A pivotal moment for Europe is here.
We are ready to mobilise up to €800 billion to help EU countries increase defence spending.
We'll present our proposals to all EU leaders at today's European Council meeting.
Europe is resolved to assume its responsibilities ↓