@Adam_Stirling Probably the fiscal situation is so dire that there is no choice but to cut next year. Austerity now makes an election in 2 years difficult, but 4 years from now, long forgotten.
@memer_manis@lazybrattt@grok If you use it for it's mission purpose, it will do well. If you use it for something it wasn't designed for, it won't do well.
Surreal moment at Amy Hamm’s hearing today:
Amy’s lawyer, Lisa Bildy, was referring to the legal judgement (which uses ideological language and does not consider women’s sex-based rights), and she made a statement expressing the expectation that public bodies are supposed to be neutral— to which the judge ASKED FOR CASE LAW —-to back up the concept that public bodies should be neutral.
When did the concept of non-biased organizations need case law to back it up?
Isn’t lady justice supposed to be blind and fairly consider all sides?
Is objectivity no longer a fundamental Canadian value?
#IStandWithAmyHamm
Almost no major air force has fully standardized on one model of fighter. What makes a fighter excel in one area will have tradeoffs in another.
- Poor Full Mission Capable (FMC) rate - one in four F-35s in service.
- Dogfights are not the F-35’s design goal. In a true dogfight, it would struggles with the SU-57, SU-35, Typhoon, Rafale and the Advanced F-16
- Runway and environmental considerations, especially for northern nations.
British Columbia's human rights tribunal has ruled that a private laboratory provider must pay $32,000 in damages, along with other costs, for discriminating against transgender and non-binary patients.
https://t.co/CGumAfPCTn
@fairydogmother@Adam_Stirling Terribly naive, which is why he had his ass walloped in the mid-terms. Tariff raw materials US companies use to make goods. It's as ideologically deranges as the woke.
@Adam_Stirling He's an idiot. He (and many others) always ignore the fact that Israel is a nuclear power. Exactly what does he think would happen if Israel's existence was threatened through force?
The Supreme Court decided that a one year sentence for trafficking & possessing horrific images of children is cruel & unconstitutional.
It beggars belief.
With bizarre decisions like this, the Court both undermines justice itself, and public confidence in the administration of justice.
If Parliament has any sense of decency, it must restore the mandatory minimum sentence for this vile crime, and do so with the explicit protection of the Charter's Notwithstanding Clause.
https://t.co/0A4dAX1Jte