This rocks. Disparate impact isn't merely bad policy, it is literally incoherent. Every law has a "disparate impact," so creating it as legal doctrine makes everything de facto illegal -- in turn giving all power to bureaucrats and judges who simply decide what will be allowed and what will be punished. Destroying this insane doctrine is of existential importance for the country.
And this, by the way, is why election results matter.
Didnβt make the news for six months.
Bristol trial. Girl, 17, 'raped by four Afghan nationals including 16-year-old boy over several hours after being lured to home' just before Christmas. https://t.co/jwiZORX5n3
This is why @MrShermichaelΒ Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines.
Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars":
"I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.
You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women?
So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat.
It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.
And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.
m00t suppressed any discussion of Gamergate (which started on /v/, not /pol/ btw), that's the main reason why a lot of people moved to 8chan back then.
Your shitlib gaslighting doesn't work when anyone older than 28 still remembers what actually happened, dumbass.
On the issue of race, Austin Metcalfβs father said this during his victim impact statement:
"The public response sickens me, especially when a gag order doesn't allow me to defend my son"
"This was never about race or politics, but what you did was to choose to make it about both. "
"We all bleed the same color "
βYou are free to make choices all of your life, but are not free to not face consequences."
1. Brandon Gill is a hero
2. The SPLC is a hate group
3. The fact that the SPLC struggles to condemn a Nazi tattooβsolely because itβs on the body of a radical leftist endorsed by Democrats as a U.S. Senate candidate in Maineβonly confirms SPLCβs status as a hate group