@StartSitSavant@NFL_Convo Well 23 personnel means 0 WR. I assume he’s playing 2 of those too. Did it occur to you that personnel terminology won’t make sense when you’re starting 7 recieving options?
@SomaKazima2 You all are delusional if you think America wasn’t the main reason the Allies won… you can hate Donald Trump but what is the goal of acting like the USA wasn’t a military powerhouse 80 years ago?
@CaptainPeeKay@BBCScotlandNews This isn’t really the same effect when the woman is consuming it, because they’re implicitly consenting to it in their fantasy. You can imagine “women want to be taken advantage of” is a more harmful contention when held by a man than by a woman.
@halette_briefer@BBCScotlandNews Most women aren’t watching porn so yeah you’re probably getting the freaky ones who are looking for that stuff. The women who want to see intimacy aren’t watching porn because there isn’t a lot of content like that.
@HighestOneYet@CoachDanCasey What does this even mean? They’re at the same yard line. The safety is basically behind him because he has to run diagonally. Thomas has the clear advantage here.
@d_millerrrr@BirdmanofAZ Those sites aren’t really fair. You have to watch the game or listen to the public discourse. They’ve had him running a complete joke of a route package for 2 years. All they let him do is go balls and comebacks. Impossible to reliably get separation on those routes.
@helincurates Nobody understands what you’re saying. Do you have a problem with the word or the definition? How is a bijection defined in your dream world??
@connacher_ This is wrong because it assumes P=NP in order to prove N=1, then later to show P=NP, which is circular reasoning. I think this problem will require more advanced algebraic techniques.
@Mongolmoid@wirmgurl This is definitely rigorous, because there is no ambiguity. I think you mean the disproof isn’t satisfying or thorough, which is a valid critique.
@dramafanreborn@buildingcoolshi You are not getting a free job out of this unless you have a complete paper with a new method/intuition for how you searched for this counterexample. Or if you provide an entire family of counterexamples. This is at most a technical report and a ton of kudos from the community.