Representing residents in Skyline Central 1 who have been asked for up to £25,000 to fix cladding that was installed with defects and inadequate fire breaks
Today we’ve taken the decision to take our Judicial Review case against the Secretary of State to the next level. We’re challenging his decision to exclude us from the fund, leaving us with life changing bills of over £20k each, including £3k VAT. Resident Nathan explains why 👇🏼
Welcome back @michaelgove @luhc Does this include Skyline Central this time? Our freeholder has been shuffling off their responsibility and making us pay for remediation works for nearly 3 years now. #EndOurCladdingScandal
.@michaelgove makes clear in Parliament that there will be no backsliding on building safety - developers and freeholders must meet their responsibilities and pay for remediation costs 👇
The government has laid out plans to extend the Building Safety Levy on all residential new builds of all heights, in a bid to plug the funding gap for buildings over 11m. It is expected to raise £3bn over the next decade. Mine and @luciemheath write-up👇https://t.co/JC9Y2dotMP
My five year journey in the cladding crisis has been emotionally exhausting. A visceral unfairness of being let down.
But the story of @SkylineCentral1 is truly heartbreaking. Penalised for moving too quickly and being told that gov purposely excluded them from accessing funding
Skyline Central is a very sad story of the building safety crisis. As we've reported previously, they were pressured into taking loans to pay for cladding removal, and as a result have been barred from relief funding. This was a conscious govt decision
https://t.co/iBzDVNyKX9
Thank you to @JSimpsonjourno and @insidehousing for continuing to tell our heartbreaking story 💔 We only wish that @CommonsLUHC @michaelgove and the many housing ministers before him, stood up for us so much.
Despite saying that leaseholders won’t have to pay, we still are…
Day 2 of my deepdive into the gov’s building safety fund. Today I look at those who have lost out.
A story 👇 and 🧵on the tragic case of those living in the @SkylineCentral1 block. They were barred from the fund before it opened and still continue to be https://t.co/4arJYZ6bgQ
“No-one living in a building more than 11 metres tall (or with 5 storeys or more) will have to pay anything for remediating flammable cladding”
Do we cancel our monthly repayments and where can we claim the money back we’ve already had to pay @luhc @michaelgove 🙏
There are no warm words that can counteract receiving an actual invoice in my name for over £112k (the first £28k of which I’m supposed to hand over in 25 days time?! )
Leaseholders need ACTUAL protection, in law, immediately.
💔
#BuildingSafetyCrisis#EndOurCladdingScandal
Let’s be honest, this isn’t the first lie @BorisJohnson.
We’re stuck paying £350 a month. For five years. Why? Because @luhc decided we were ‘too proactive in making our homes safe’.
They said the decision was deliberate…
https://t.co/jG7G1HurQ9 via @MailOnline
Building safety crisis doesn’t stop at cladding. There’s still no guarantee that leaseholders will be protected from paying for non-cladding problems. Developers & investors must not be allowed to profit from shoddy, substandard & unsafe housing - end of https://t.co/qi9tVzwmMZ
There needs to be more clarity on this - we all remember the plight of @SkylineCentral1 leaseholders and the unfairness that they were excluded of the BSF for acting early.
Good question from Mike Penning on what happens to l'holders who have already paid for remediation. Gove says he can’t compensate those that have already contributed. Again feels like those who (correctly) acted fast and got their buildings fixed first, are going to lose out😔
I too am angry about the Christmas party. But I would honestly like to see some more anger over the fact that the government covered up the risk of dangerous cladding for three decades before Grenfell and still had the audacity this week to pretend it caught them by surprise
The government isn’t willing to do that, but was willing to preside over a shockingly poor building control system which signed thousands of buildings off as ‘safe’.
The result for us? £350 a month, for five years. Fair?
"I fought this battle for a couple of years," says former housing secretary Robert Jenrick on who pays to change cladding, "the Treasury... is simply not willing to do that"
Thousands of flat owners are facing large bills to change cladding
https://t.co/nEpLYkOX9M #PoliticsLive
"I fought this battle for a couple of years," says former housing secretary Robert Jenrick on who pays to change cladding, "the Treasury... is simply not willing to do that"
Thousands of flat owners are facing large bills to change cladding
https://t.co/nEpLYkOX9M #PoliticsLive
Our letter to @michaelgove about the devastating news of Tom Mansell’s death. “This is not the first letter @luhc has received from us, but it is the saddest. It is also written by campaigners at their very angriest.”
#EndOurCladdingScandal