@arbsmichael "Covid free" WA (and QLD) also had the highest excess death rates in Australia during their lockdown isolation, which has made every medical expert, to this day, a deaf & blind mute on the matter.
(4:30) https://t.co/5IUIIDyG9r
@IntCyberDigest The EU is also launching the Compliant Intercourse Initiative (CII). If two individuals want to have sex, they will use the mandatory app to signal intent. Once approved for intercourse, Ursula Von Der Lyen will manually verify the act is compliant using the on-device camera.
Everyone thinks this war is for Israel.
Everyone thinks Israel controls the US.
Everyone thinks Netanyahu owns Trump.
This agreement with Iran and the subsequent jewish outrage over Trumps “betrayal” is about managing public opinion and nothing else.
The war will continue because jews want it. No agreement, truce, or ceasefire Trump pens is worth the paper it’s written on. And he will back Israel regardless of how stupid, humiliated, or dishonest they make him look
🚨 🇮🇱 THIS IS MASSIVE
An ISRAELI CYBER FIRM just got exposed for running a GLOBAL ELECTION INTERFERENCE OPERATION across five countries, simultaneously.
Read that again.
The moment journalists called BlackCore for comment, the company DELETED ITS ENTIRE INTERNET PRESENCE
This is what a ROGUE STATE does when it can’t win the argument.
[More details in the replies 👇🏼 ]
Trump issued a public warning to Israel last week not to bomb Beirut so he could negotiatiate a deal with the Iranians, but Israel bombed Beirut anyway.
Point 1: The Chomskyites will eventually have to concede that the tail wags the dog - i.e. Israel has more influence over the US than vice versa.
Point 2: The retarded philosemites who desperately try to pin Israel's intransigence on Netanyahu can't explain why this exact scenario played out in 1982 under Menachem Begin. They can only hope you are ignorant of history.
From Ronald Reagan's autobiography, An American Life:
"On August 4, two days after I'd met with Israeli Foreign Minister, Yitzhak Shamir in the Oval Office and appealed to him in the strongest words I could think of for Israel to use restraint, I was awakened at 6:30am by my national security advisor. He said that the Israelis had just moved into new positions within West Beirut and were shelling the city with a savage ferocity that was killing more and more civilians. Outraged, Phil Habib telephoned me from Beirut and said that the shelling was so intense and so unrelenting that he was unable to get to meetings he had scheduled to negotiate a settlement to the dispute. I decided to appeal personally to Menachem Begin to stop the fighting and abide by the ceasefire so that Habib could complete his work. I suggested to Begin that if he didn't, he could expect a drastic change in Israel's relationship with the United States. 'This disproportionate bombing of West Beirut,' my message stated, was exacting 'unacceptable human costs and making negotiations impossible.' If it continued, I said, it would be impossible for me to defend the proposition that Israel used American-made weapons for defensive purposes only...Each time I communicated with them, however, I emphasized my personal committment and that of the United States to the support of Israel. I supported its right to defend itself against attack, but appealed for Israel not to go on the offensive unless it was the victim of a provocation of such magnitude that the world would easily understand its right to retaliate. Israel's response was, in effect: Mind your own business. It is up to Israel alone to decide what it must do to ensure its survival."
It is important to understand that Reagan is candidly admitting that Israel was using American-made weapons for offensive purposes, which is a violation of the Foreign Assistance Act, Arms Export Control Act, Leahy Laws, etc. In fact, Reagan admitted Israel was in violation in his autobiography:
"Technically, Israel had violated an agreement with us not to use US-made weapons for offensive purposes, and some cabinet members wanted me to lean hard on Israel because it had broken this pledge. We sent a note to the Israeli government criticizing the raid, and delayed shipment of several additional military aircraft as a show of our displeasure."
Point 3: It should now be clear why Israel favors moving away from military aid to a "partnership." Israel wants to remove what they call the "golden handcuffs" so they can cleanse all of their neighbors without the US using its military aid as a carrot to exert any influence over it. However, abandoning aid in favor of a partnership creates a dependency on Israel for US national security. This will further tie the US's hands in restraining Israel so as to avoid any disruptions to its own defense ecosystem.
Crazy that this is getting barely any coverage. This year’s European Press Prize was just awarded to an investigative report by the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant. It is entitled “What the Wounds Tell” and in it the journalists Maud Effting and Willem Feenstra document the cases of 114 children in Gaza under the age of 15 who were struck by a single bullet to the head or chest. Almost all of them died or were left severely disabled. They chose to document only the cases of boys and girls under the age of 15 (though often much younger: aged 3, 4 or 7) because these are children who can be immediately identified as such. “A single bullet in these parts of the body is a clear indication that these children were deliberately targeted“, the two journalists write.
This is the article: https://t.co/YkZrpqBWBQ
They tried to convince you for years that Iran is a threat to Israel, when it’s Israel that’s an expansionist state with nuclear weapons, committing genocide, and starting wars.
Iran is a threat to Israel’s hegemony because it can actually fight back, so they want to destroy it.
People like me take great pains to avoid coming across as antisemitic in our criticisms of Israel, and then Jewish Zionists go to these events all “Yes we Jews need to be actively manipulating western institutions in order to deceive everyone and control society.”
🚨BREAKING: Hezbollah Releases Victory Video — 6 Million Drones Finally Slay South Lebanon’s Colossal Female IDF Landwhale
Absolute unit absorbed 5.8 million FPV drones like a black hole before the last swarm reached vital organs. She wobbled, burped propellers, then face-planted like a demolished building. Hezbollah spokesman: 'We liberated the land from this Zionist landwhale.' #OperationGastricJihad
Let me trace the timeline here because nobody's connecting it.
Step 1: Scrape the entire internet. Every book, every article, every conversation, every piece of art, every forum post. Do it without asking. Do it without paying.
Step 2: Train a model on all of it. Call it "artificial intelligence."
Step 3: Go to BlackRock's Infrastructure Summit and announce: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter."
Step 3 is where you sell people's own knowledge back to them. On a meter.
They took the collective output of human thought, compressed it into a model, and now they want to charge you by the token to access a version of what you and everyone you know already created.
One Reddit user put it perfectly: "They stole all this data from us, the people, our life's work, creativity, art, by devouring the internet and blowing through all copyright laws. Now they want to sell it back to us in the form of a utility."
Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies.
That's the metered intelligence business model.
And they're pitching it to infrastructure investors as though they invented water.
Channel 9 news anchor Allison Langdon, who's paid $1.5 million a year, exposes her hypocrisy. Are viewers going to sit there and watch her put on a sad face for those injured by the 'safe and effectives' just because there's a policy shift at the station?
UNDERSTAND HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS ARE USED TO MOLD YOUR BEHAVIOUR...
The clip below is the 60 second "This is Our Shot" video widely deployed in Australia in 2021, to drive uptake of Covid vaccination.
It is a masterclass in Behavioural Psychology...it is "Engineered Persuasion", and understanding its techniques makes YOU less vulnerable to psychological manipulation now and in the future.
*Core slogan "This is our shot" - repeated more than 12 times in 60 seconds - REPETITION triggers the illusory truth effect. Familiar statements start to feel obviously true (even with no supporting evidence).
Pairing this statement with "our" fuses the vaccine with national identity and belonging (both powerful human drivers)
*Strong evoking of positive emotion. Rapid cuts show flashes of happy and positive connection and behaviour - families reuniting, packed stadiums, live music, open borders etc. This montage powerfully taps into the human trait of "loss aversion"....we feared and hated losing our normal life MORE than we value the gains of taking the jab.
*The vaccine is NEVER presented as a medical product, or taking it presented as a health/medical decision. Rather this video presents it as the EMOTIONAL KEY that unlocks life, community and connection - human essentials. This is called "Affective Conditioning".
*Frequent use of "Social Proof". The video presents a wide spectrum of races, ages and types of people, all saying YES to the vaccine...all moving forward with their lives.
This is "social proof".... "if people like me are doing it....I should do it too". The psychological effect of this is to make you believe you are not just protecting yourself; you are instead completing the mission with your fellow citizens.
*The final video call "Come on Australia, let's get the job done"...effectively turns vaccination into a team sport
*Visual and sensory cues throughout the video operate below conscious awareness - warm golden light, lens flares, upbeat pacing, comfortable familiar settings - all create emotional contagion. We literally "catch" the positive emotion evoked in the video and want to feel the same away as the happy, positive people on the screen.
*Binary framing - take the vaccine and you are socially acceptable, one of the pack and life can move on happily. Inference is if you do not take the vaccine you are outside of the pack. Shunned, and the reason why life cannot move on.
THESE TECHNIQUES ARE USED REPEATEDLY TODAY TO DRIVE YOUR BEHAVIOURAL CHOICES...