@JDScholten We could change how we get the highest vote count. A simple change would be to allow the lowest vote count to back a higher vote count. In a primary or a general election we could make a different change than the rest of the country.
@DaveForIowa@ZachWahls@Lindsay4Iowa@Bohannan4Iowa We should address how we get the highest vote count. Allowing the lowest vote count to back a higher vote count after a primary or general election. Would address the fact that people have complex reasons why they believe something. Life is not really an A or B answer.
@ZachWahls We should address how we get the highest vote count. Allowing lowest vote count to back a higher vote count in a primary or general election. Would take out the need to demonize each other.
@SteveKingIA We should address how we get the highest vote count. Letting the lowest vote count back a higher vote count would take out the need to go to convention or a runoff. The day after the primary we could have a simple majority winner.
@bobvanderplaats The only thing I can think of is betting on the delegates choosing at convention. Wish Trump would have stayed out of a very tight race.
@RobSandIA I have talked to Fisher and Sweeny my reps. Challenge how we get the highest vote count. Allow lowest vote counts after primaries and general elections to back higher vote counts. Hubble might not have been the Democrat nominee last governor election if that was put in place.
@Joeinblack When we get to heaven. Jesus being the sheep gate between neighbors. How much will be easier to reconcile when someone is actually trying to be a neighbor. Jesus taking on the sin between neighbors.
@bobvanderplaats@adamsteen We have a highest vote count problem. We need to simplify things by allowing the lowest vote count candidates to back someone with a higher vote count after the primaries or general election. That way having 5 people running is not a big problem.