@NetsDaily MPJ basically started at pf last yr. So a Watson or Minott easily starts next to him. And take a look at Minott substack scouting video and Wolves highlights. Shows more on ball chops than last yr. Been nice if HE had 30+ minutes to explore those skills.
@TonezSports@BrooklynNets MPJ is 8th in gravity metric, 6th in perimeter gravity. But quick trigger does it in a way where ball doesn't stop moving. Also, not as down on Clax as some. 3+ assists # could improve. And 30 yr Wagner didn't look good last yr, though more time from acl, maybe he improves.
@TonezSports@BrooklynNets Get the allure. And based on what Jordi did with MPJ, CamJohn, Schroeder, etc., think Randle will actually be very good this yr. But much rather have Jordi use those skills on younger upside players. And, we already have player who draws attention so young backcourt can operate
@TonezSports@BrooklynNets Nice thorough take on off season. Definitely agree big positive the young backcourt. Best rest of off season, have to respectfully disagree.
Full disclosure, hate Marks. But just don't get how how bringing in a sometimes moody 32 yr old turnover prone ball-stopper a good idea.
@NetsDaily But why did they have to choose. That archetype is coveted. Especially the way Jordi likes to play. Oh wait. Forgot. Giving 30+ minutes to a 32 yr old. No room. The Watsons, Williams of the world are type of players they should have pursued/kept.
@NetsKingdomAJ@databallr And/or raising floor with younger players with untapped potential/lack of opportunity they COULD HAVE acquired. Much made of Randle going off with Jordi coaching. Agree 100%. But would be nice 2 c staff that got career yrs out of MPJ, CamJohn, etal, 2 do that with youngsters.
@NetsKingdomAJ@databallr See the allure. But I'd like 2 focus on lineup that played 10x more minutes and broke slightly above even. Randle deal backers talk about floor raising. Instead of adding a 32 yr old, could've raised floor with Minott 4 Clowney, MBJ 4 Mann, with replaced players available 4 bench
@GuruTwoey@PodThorn I think part of the problem was playing with KD/Kyrie. If memory serves, when Clax in gleague as rook, they were letting him play like a 3/4. But once he got 2 big club with those guys, got pigeon-holed in limited center type role.
@brooklynnets85 Agree 100% Lots been made about how well Randle going to do based on what Jordi did with MPJ CamJohn. Would have been to see what this staff could do with an Aldama, or any of the other low risk/salary, high upside guys that were available.
@NetsDaily Yes, true! However, Knick management, unlike Net management, KNOWS what they are doing. Is adept at judging talent. If they don't defend the title this yr, they'll start making the necessary moves. They won't drop far
@BillyReinhardt Definitely agree with Jordi's coaching plus I'm sure Randle is hyped to be a #1 option again, Randle could have a big statistical yr. Best scenario is he goes nuclear, which leads to bidding war at the trade deadline.
@NetsDaily No, ranked about where they should. What's this team's identity. Adding Randle & Wagner, subtracting Clax, severely lessen rim protection/offensive rim pressure. What little we MAY gain in offense, give right back defensively!
@BillyReinhardt@JacManuell The draft compensation was only moving up 5 slots. And investment high considering the crunch time on ball reps he'll take from MBJ & Denim. Throw in giving away Clax, whose playmaking improved, along with other moves. Just don't get it!
@NetsDaily SMDH! To think that all these Nets fans believe adding a soon 2 b 32 yr ball stopper, whose slow in transition (offense and defense), turnover prone, not good in crunch time (check the #'s) player to a team that prefers to run a ball movement offense/pressure defense is beyond me