slomgun

Proud Jewish Deaf

[slomgun @slomgun]

@JewishWarrior13 What did JD do?

[slomgun @slomgun]

@AnamaMOSS It’s your life. Nothing to do with racism. It’s also about qualifications. Do they have a real or fake degrees?

[slomgun @slomgun]

If I want to live and work in Europe but it now requires a Visa, what do I need to do?

[Henshi @HenshiG]

This is utterly heartbreaking — and a damning indictment of the platforms we trust with our children.

Labour MP Melanie Ward did what every concerned parent and guardian should never have to do: she set up a fake Instagram account as “David, 17” to test the platform’s claims about delivering age-appropriate content to teens.

Within just 11 minutes of scrolling — without searching for anything — the algorithm flooded this fake teen account with vile antisemitic conspiracy theories and tropes.
Melanie Ward rightly called this failure a “disgrace.”

In Parliament, she declared: “This is a disgrace and just one example of why it is time to stop asking social media companies to make their products safe and instead start requiring them to do so through regulation.”

Our children are not collateral damage in the pursuit of engagement and profit. They are impressionable, curious, and vulnerable — and far too many are being radicalized by hatred before they’ve even had a chance to form their own worldview.

Antisemitism is being served up like candy to teenagers who simply open the app.

This isn’t just a technical glitch. It’s a moral failure. Platforms that promise safety for our young people while profiting from the spread of ancient hatreds must be held accountable — not with polite requests, but with real, enforceable regulation.

We must protect the next generation from this poison. Our children deserve better. They deserve safety, truth, and a chance to grow up without being indoctrinated into hate.

Thank you, Melanie Ward, for shining a light on this darkness. May this moment spark real change — before another child’s feed becomes a gateway to bigotry.

Full story here: https://t.co/a89Pcy9eJX

[slomgun @slomgun]

@LionsOfZion_ORG @Lionesssa12 Cannot dispute this. 100% on Trump.

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

🚨 NOW: The fact that they can do this without any FEAR of repercussions is very telling.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

Flashback:
Mahmoud Habbash, the adviser to the Palestinian president, has revealed that Hamas deliberately kills women and children in Gaza in order to damage Israel’s image. They use them as human shields and then sacrifice their bodies as propaganda tools.

This is not a secret. This is official Palestinian Authority admission.
Time and time again, Hamas starts futile wars against Israel, using women and children in Gaza as human shields to cause their deliberate deaths.

Once the bodies pile up, Hamas and its supporters parade the corpses in front of cameras to accuse Israel of “genocide.”

The Western media, hungry for dramatic images and hostile to Israel, happily plays along with this grotesque propaganda.

[slomgun @slomgun]

@GCon57 @saras76 We’re way past that now

[slomgun @slomgun]

@ChiefEngineerCE @Dan_Schwartz I want a list of all the companies that are posting HB-1 jobs for one simple reason - I will not buy shares. Too many horror stories about fake degrees and crappy work that are affecting the bottom line.

[Matthew Feinberg @thewebbie]

If you are upset with me for calling out woke, just wait for my 9 step plan to be released.

[slomgun @slomgun]

@thewebbie @YoAdrienne1968 Not kosher enough for me to eat and tastes awful. There are better kosher brands that I buy.

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Oh yea, Israel is totally the problem. 🙃

[Skscartoon @skscartoon]

@elonmusk

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

Even Arab leaders admit it.

Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.

Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.

Ok, so let us set that aside.

Now watch this.

In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.

Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.

He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.

The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.

This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.

When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.

The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.

This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.

If you value the truth, please share.

[slomgun @slomgun]

@VerminusM @27kislev5719 If the Jews moved to the Moon or Mars, will that still be considered “occupied”?

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

What a bittersweet concept.

They should all be with us today. Maybe in an alternate and more just reality, they still are...

[slomgun @slomgun]

@realDonaldTrump @POTUS
This is on your watch. You own this if you don’t do anything about this. Withdrawing from NATO isn’t enough.

[Harry Theocharous @TheocharousH]

TURKEY EYEING CONQUEST OF JERUSALEM🚨

Turkish Interior Minister openly declares neo-Ottoman ambitions and a direct threat to Israel, making his country’s intentions crystal clear.

This is not some fringe statement, it’s a senior member of @RTErdogan’s government openly threatening the conquest and control of Israel’s capital Jerusalem and expressing faith that Turkish rule will return.

This is classic neo-Ottoman revivalism, the dream of resurrecting the empire and the explicit rejection of Israeli sovereignty over its own historic capital.

When Turkish officials start fantasizing about governing Jerusalem again, it reveals the real long-term agenda, rolling back the post-Ottoman order and putting Jewish sovereignty in the crosshairs.

Israel should treat such statements with the gravity they deserve, not as empty rhetoric, but as signals of strategic hostility from a NATO member that increasingly acts like an adversary.

[slomgun @slomgun]

I wish to know any public companies besides Boeing who is still going this. I don’t want to buy their shares. It will become worthless.

[John Ʌ Konrad V @johnkonrad]

Because you are a former Royal Air Force general, let me put the reason for @PeteHegseth’s D-Day speech in terms you will recognize.

In 2005, Boeing hired James McNerney, a disciple of Jack Welch’s school of cost-cutting, as CEO. He later said, “When people say I changed the culture of Boeing, that was the intent, so that it’s run like a business rather than a great engineering firm.”

The results were catastrophic.

As Eric Ries documented in his book Incorruptible, management focused more and more on financial engineering while the engineers inside Boeing watched one program after another unfold with growing horror. We have their internal records because of the investigations into the 737 MAX crashes.

Engineering raised the alarm. Management’s answer never changed: costs, deadlines, stock price. The number on the slide had become the mission, and the airplane underneath it had become an afterthought.

That is the trap. Stock price was never the product. It was a proxy for the product, a stand-in for whether Boeing built aircraft people could trust their lives to. McNerney optimized the proxy and destroyed the thing it was supposed to measure. Two planes full of families paid for the difference.

One Boeing employee later confessed, “I still haven’t been forgiven by God for the covering up I did last year.” Psychologists call that moral injury: the inner damage a person carries from knowing they did harm by saying nothing.

What does this have to do with DEI, migration, and the agendas being pushed across the EU and UK?

Everything. They run on the same machinery.

A minority arrest rate is not justice. It is a proxy for justice, a stand-in for whether a city is safe and its law applied equally. Starmer’s government optimized the proxy.

Officers who flagged the cost of a pivot to DEI, the victims who came forward, the communities who watched predators walk, all of it was feedback, and all of it was waved off because the statistic was moving in the politically correct direction. The number improved. Justice did not. Just as Boeing’s engineers were told costs, deadlines, stock price, Britain’s police were told the quota, the optics, the politics.

Welch chased ROI. Starmer chases DEI. John Kerry chases CO2. All ignored the people in front of them telling the truth. Both mistook the dashboard for the world.

I too want safe minorities, higher share prices and a cleaner planet. We all do. That is exactly the point. McNerney wanted a higher stock price too. The disaster was not the goal. The disaster was measuring the proxy and calling it the product.

Last year, touring colleges in London, a family friend asked me a version of the question Boeing’s own engineers asked each other before the crashes. Theirs was, “Would you put your family on a MAX simulator-trained aircraft?” The answer was no. Mine was simpler: would I put my daughter on streets policed by a two-tier system, where carrying pepper spray to defend herself is a crime but the men she fears walk free?

Which brings us to Hegseth.

This is not the usual venue for these arguments, and I understand the objection. I endorse his saying it here anyway, because it needs to be said, and because the people who most need to hear it are the ones who have learned to look at the dashboard instead of out the window.

You know the cost of silence better than I do. The veteran who watched Afghan allies rape children on our own bases and was told to stand down, to protect the relationship. They enforced the rules of engagement because those were being measured by you. That man is carrying moral injury for the rest of his life. Some of them did not survive it. Too many witnessed a dual tiered system - US/UK troops held accountable for honest ROE mistakes while Taliban used women and kids as shields - and paid the ultimate price for saying nothing.

This is not the ideal place to bring up politics but is absolutely the right place to prevent further moral injury.

[gabedraws @gabedrawsX]

@slomgun @thewebbie @SenRickScott @NYCMayor @slomgun

[slomgun @slomgun]

@judeangeneral2 @MorEdge_Insight Are you being sarcastic?